<aaabbb>
all 251 frames in total (25fps). for comparision hevc (veryslow crf20 tune psnr) = 2.4mb. i'm surprised that a dedicated lossless codec performs worse than lzma
<furq>
what do you get with x264 -qp 0
waleee has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
<aaabbb>
furq: 25mb
yazooq has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
Muimi has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
Muimi has joined #ffmpeg
theobjectivedad has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
theobjectivedad has joined #ffmpeg
bitbinge has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
bitbinge has joined #ffmpeg
Hackerpcs has quit [Quit: Hackerpcs]
Hackerpcs has joined #ffmpeg
Hackerpcs has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
bitbinge has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bitbinge has joined #ffmpeg
Hackerpcs has joined #ffmpeg
BUSY has quit [Quit: Leaving]
jagannatharjun has joined #ffmpeg
Muimi has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
dbal has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
rv1sr has joined #ffmpeg
flotwig has quit [Excess Flood]
flotwig has joined #ffmpeg
Vonter has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
AbleBacon has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
lusciouslover has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
vlm has joined #ffmpeg
<aaabbb>
so why is ffv1 producing worse compression than lzma? am i using it wrong? is it not effective at compressing low resolution or short videos?