dlcusa has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dlcusa has joined #crux-social
dlcusa has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
dlcusa_ has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
dlcusa has joined #crux-social
remiliascarlet has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
remiliascarlet has joined #crux-social
dlcusa_ has joined #crux-social
SiFuh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
SiFuh has joined #crux-social
lavaball has joined #crux-social
lavaball has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
lavaball has joined #crux-social
<SiFuh>
What the fuck is 'dash' doing in core?
<SiFuh>
Shouldn't it be sh?
serpente has joined #crux-social
farkuhar has joined #crux-social
<farkuhar>
darfo's latest reply to the mailing list defends the decision of what should go into core, using the criterion "If [the maintainers] ain't having fun with CRUX they should, as a group, shrink the work as they see fit." Although the applicability of this criterion to dash/sh is doubtful, at least in the case of linux-pam he seems to be saying it would be too much work to patch all the ports affected by removal of PAM.
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: emmett1 was explaining to me about the dash/sh thing just now
<farkuhar>
Compared to the patching effort needed to accommodate replacing glibc with musl, patching the ports affected by removal of PAM should be much easier.
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: Stenur rides a bicycle. Has a licence for 125 but doesn't ride. He wants a Royal Endfield Interceptor which is pretty cool ;-)
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: There is almost no patching for musl at the moment
<SiFuh>
I am currently compiling a kernel for it. I want to transfer to bare metal and do a real bootstrap. Because currently the kmod segfaults and I realised that emmett1 didn't do the bootstrap like we do in CRUX. He did a shorter version. When I recompiled musl. The entire system broke.
<farkuhar>
Creating a manageable workload is actually darfo's stronger argument. He's on weaker ground when he suggests that the recent accusations of core being bloated by linux-pam are all motivated by a desire to run CRUX on embedded systems.
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: Yes I understood the first two times
<farkuhar>
What do you call that debating tactic? A strawman argument?
<serpente>
patch ports? its basically remove "--enable-pam" from shadow port
<SiFuh>
I call it limited perspective or a short sighted opinion
<serpente>
those acusations are heavily embased
<farkuhar>
SiFuh: "the first two times" were in a private chat. I'm repeating myself here to reach a wider audience, without cluttering up the mailing list and continuing the derailment of that thread.
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: Your apology is accepted ;-)
<farkuhar>
I might as well share something else that came up in a private chat, then. The tornado outbreak that devastated Oklahoma last weekend only brought wind and rain to jaeger's location, not an extended interruption of the electric grid. https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/archive/event.php?date=20240427
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: Isn't that the path the eclipse followed?
<farkuhar>
SiFuh: it looks pretty similar, doesn't it?
<SiFuh>
farkuhar: Yes, those Jewish space lasers are at it again.