<SiFuh>
* A new component "systemd-bsod" has been added, which can show logged
<SiFuh>
error messages full screen, if they have a log level of LOG_EMERG log
<SiFuh>
level. This component is experimental and its public interface is
<SiFuh>
subject to change.
<remiliascarlet>
ppetrov^: It's for a reason systemd is considered broken by design for almost 10 years now: https://ewontfix.com/14/
<remiliascarlet>
Also proves all the UNIX greybeards of systemd turning Linux gay, I mean turning Linux into Windows were right all along.
<ppetrov^>
i really have no opinion, i neither like it or hate it
<ppetrov^>
however, all major Linux distros adopted it
<SiFuh>
remiliascarlet: That was my actual thought. Why turn Linux into Windows when Windows sucks and steals everything from Linux and says it is their own
<remiliascarlet>
I used to have no opinion on systemd before, until it started getting in the way a bit too often.
<SiFuh>
BSD! BSD! BSD!
<ppetrov^>
OpenBSD?
<SiFuh>
Sure, why not.
<remiliascarlet>
Also, the only major distro that isn't strictly systemd is Gentoo.
<ppetrov^>
also Slackware
<remiliascarlet>
I think a lot of people would regard Slackware as a niche distro nowadays.
<SiFuh>
I remember an article about it on Slackware saying they don't care about the topic and if it happens it will happen (Paraphrasing)
<ppetrov^>
remiliascarlet, it's still one of the major ones, imo
<remiliascarlet>
Neither Void cares, the only reason they chose not to adopt systemd is because it doesn't play nicely with musl.
<SiFuh>
I consider it to be for sure ppetrov^
<remiliascarlet>
The most hardcore systemd/Linux distro's are all RHEL-based ones, which makes sense because systemd is a Red Hat product.
<remiliascarlet>
And perhaps Arch too, considering the amount of packages having systemd as a dependency for no good reason.
<ppetrov^>
Arch adopting systemd made many users scratch their heads
<SiFuh>
Does Android use systemd?
<remiliascarlet>
I actually like the CRUX way the best, it's not even an init system, it's very much like the BSD's.
<remiliascarlet>
Android uses busybox I believe.
<remiliascarlet>
Well, technically CRUX does have an init system, just not one with a very fancy name.
<SiFuh>
I'd like to see a new one named Shit-init and I will laugh everytime I hear someone say it.
<remiliascarlet>
I configured a FreeBSD init, and it was OK-ish.
<remiliascarlet>
I configured an OpenBSD init, and it was god like.
<remiliascarlet>
I configured a CRUX init, and I felt like it was a more verbose version of OpenBSD.
<ppetrov^>
and after Shit-init, the leading Linux distros will hire a young developer to create "shitsemd"
<remiliascarlet>
Can't speak for NetBSD and Dragonfly BSD, because I barely even touched NetBSD, and never touched Dragonfly BSD at all.
<SiFuh>
I use the init system from the Linux Distro called Bucket, shit-init.
<remiliascarlet>
Configuring a runit init script is like, "how the fuck does this shit even work?".
<remiliascarlet>
Android is just running in a JVM.
<SiFuh>
remiliascarlet: Easy, it is like dropping a torrent file in a folder that qBittorrent sees and loads
<remiliascarlet>
I know, but I mean more on a much lower level.
<SiFuh>
Limbo
<remiliascarlet>
Just got an idea: let's make an "illegal" fork of RHEL, make it open source again, and replace systemd with sinit. That will piss them off twice!
<SiFuh>
Let's call it NRHEL
<remiliascarlet>
And replace Gnome with DWM to add wood to the fire.
<remiliascarlet>
I thought more of RHNL (Red Hat's Not Linux).
<SiFuh>
No, Not Red Hat Enterpirse Linux
<SiFuh>
Not Red Hat's linux
<SiFuh>
Ho about Red Hat Sucks
<remiliascarlet>
Then somebody else makes a fork that undoes all of that (except for making code open source), and calls it TNNRHEL (Totally Not Not Red Het Enterprise Linux).
<remiliascarlet>
s/Het/Hat
<remiliascarlet>
And that somebody else goes by the name Pennard Loettering.
<SiFuh>
SystemD's nutz
<remiliascarlet>
And he's totally not a Microsoft employee.