07:34 <geertu> zyp: the order is specified by e.g. the compatible value

07:35 <geertu> or you can use a version register. If that doesn't exist yey, you also mean a new compatible value to distinguish between the variant with and without version register.

07:50 <MoeIcenowy> somlo: litesdcard seems to suffer from some regression when trying to driver it on Linux

07:51 <MoeIcenowy> get -ETIMEDOUT

07:51 <MoeIcenowy> bisecting.

09:00 <DerekKozel[m]> _florent_: Setting up a matrix discord bridge is super quick. GNU Radio uses this service and it's reliable except when very busy when it can be somewhat laggy.

09:00 <DerekKozel[m]> https://t2bot.io/discord/

09:00 <tpb> Title: t2bot.io - Discord Bridge (at t2bot.io)

09:01 <_florent_> Hi, since it can be more convenient than IRC for some developers (and also for me I think); I just created a Discord server for LiteX: https://discord.gg/Qhz8yEZA

09:01 <tpb> Title: LiteX (at discord.gg)

09:02 <_florent_> DerekKozel[m]: Hehe, you've been faster than me :), thanks for the link for the bridge, I was going to have a closer look at this

09:03 <DerekKozel[m]> I don't use discord, so desperate not to get disconnected :)

09:05 <DerekKozel[m]> To be fair, I'd forgotten that this channel is authoritatively hosted on IRC

09:09 <sensille> i hope it stays on irc :)

09:23 <_florent_> sensille, DerekKozel[m]: Yes I'll set up a bridge soon

11:30 <MoeIcenowy> bisecting litesdcard fails

12:06 <somlo> MoeIcenowy: I'd try bisecting myself, but weirdly enough sdcard works for me (on litex+rocket, tested on nexys video and ecpix5) both in the litex bios and in linux

12:06 <somlo> so maybe something else is broken on your setup?

13:54 <MoeIcenowy> somlo: I don't know

13:54 <MoeIcenowy> maybe

13:59 <MoeIcenowy> somlo: https://github.com/Icenowy/linux-on-litex-openc906 if you want to take a look on my setup (I reused it to run a Rocket-based SoC

14:01 <MoeIcenowy> BTW LiteX BIOS has no issue, so maybe there is really something wrong in my setup

18:24 <somlo> geertu: I just force-pushed a new version of the litex-rebase branch (https://github.com/litex-hub/linux/tree/litex-rebase)

18:24 <somlo> should be easy to test with the top commit applied (squashed irq support for liteuart) vs. removed (everything as it was before for a very long time, only rebased on top of the latest Linus tree as of this morning)

18:26 <somlo> I figured since the individual "sausage-making" commits are now rebased on top of tty-next, we can just have a single commit reflecting the whole thing applied in litex-rebase, temporarily, until the "real" patches make it upstream

18:27 <somlo> on the off chance any of the uart irq stuff is what breaks things for you, we'll have a chance to address it before I'll submit the (inevitable) v5