ArmbianHelper changed the topic of #armbian to: armbian - Linux for ARM development boards | www.armbian.com | Github: github.com/armbian | Commits: #armbian-commits | Developer talk: #armbian-devel | Forum/Twitter feed: #armbian-rss | Type 'help' for help | Logs: -> irc.armbian.com
<Armbian-Discord>
<Tonymac32> Trs-80 I assume you'd like to avoid boot blobs, but the Libre Computer la Frite should fit nicely
<Armbian-Discord>
<Tonymac32> If 32-bit is ok there is also Libre Computer Tritium, both should be able to tango with your DACs. I can do some checking, but also selling house so things are a bit sideways for hardware testing atm
<TRS-80>
Thanks, I'll check availability on those. I vaguely remember you recommending Tritium last time we discussed this, but now I'm actually really motivated to buy hardware since I got the network streaming working.
archetech has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
xoan5 has joined #armbian
xoan has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
xoan5 is now known as xoan
alekksander has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
<belsis>
Hi it is nice to see that my armbian system was patched for the policykit issue https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5059 . I would like to double check the version if possible apt-cache policy policykit-1 returns Installed: 0.105-31 will this be the same as 0.105-31+deb11u1 ?
<Werner>
This package comes entirely from userspace (Debian, Ubuntu to say) IIRC. We we have nothing to do with it.
<belsis>
(running on bullseye? )
<Werner>
So the package comes directly from Debian Bullseye ;)
<JackFrost>
And bullseye is patched.
<belsis>
Yes. I .. was already quite happy to see my unatended updates to have worked but I do no know how to get that last "deb11u1" information out of apt
<JackFrost>
`apt-get changelog policykit-1` should show you changes, but yeah you'll want 0.105-31+deb11u1. You're not by chance missing the security repo(s)?
<belsis>
A hmm no. it shows 0.105-31 CVE-2021-3560 (dated Thu, 03 Jun 2021) . my /etc/apt/sources.list do not list security just bullseye , bullseye-updates and bullseye-backports
<JackFrost>
I think that's actually a duplicate though. >_>
<belsis>
it indeed looks like a cuplicate (the fetch even shows the same url) but indeed I was missing those repositories and now have a polkit update.
<belsis>
thanks.
<belsis>
it is common to not add the security updates repository? are you aware of other things to do to "harden" security?