11:39 < medias661Gitter[> Hello, sir @rcurtin @zoq I already submitted a proposal for my GSOC 2021 regarding adding some Model Zoo for mlpack. What If in the future there is someone who opened a PR implementing the same model as I did, Do I need to change the model that I am going to implement or there is another action I can take?

11:46 < median> Hello I just already upload my GSOC Proposals

11:48 < ImagineZero0Gitt> Hey, @zoq Thanx for the great feedback and all your help, I had updated the draft according to some of your comments, it would be really helpful if you have time to take a final look, I think that it might be good.

11:48 < ImagineZero0Gitt> (edited) ... that it might be good. => ... that this draft is compatively better than the previous ones.

12:07 < ABHINAVANAND[m]> zoq In last message I showed seed-up on backward of mean pooling. Now this colab will show the speed-up in forward of mean-pool. We can extend this to LP pooling also.

12:07 < ABHINAVANAND[m]> Do take a look and let me know if there are any mistakes. <https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1MmJoeJfFaJ--ugz8VAViHsHTjssYCn3L?usp=sharing>

12:12 < rcurtin[m]> @medias661 don't worry, if someone opens a PR for that model type, we can easily change the proposal. if you like, you could add a few "alternates" that you might implement in case that happens

12:13 < rcurtin[m]> * medias661 (Gitter): don't worry, if someone opens a PR for that model type, we can easily change the proposal. if you like, you could add a few "alternates" that you might implement in case that happens

12:15 < medias661Gitter[> Even if it's already after the deadline we can still change the proposal (I mean if we got selected to GSOC 2021 of course) ? @rcurtin

12:20 < rcurtin[m]> you can't change it on the website, but we can of course have discussions and get in touch if anything needs to change 👍️

12:23 < medias661Gitter[> OK then thanks, sir. I will edit my proposals again to include some alternatives If the model already implemented by someone in the future.

13:18 < FawwazMaydaGitte> Thanks for the insight I will update my proposals again for including some alternatives. Thanks, @rcurtin for the explanation.

17:59 < rcurtin[m]> finally all green! http://ci.mlpack.org/job/docker%20-%20build%20gcc%20images/

17:59 < rcurtin[m]> now I need to do the same for clang :)

18:06 < shrit[m]> The magic of cross dependencies

20:05 < zoq> Cool, I guess at some point once boost can be removed the matrix is going to be smaller.

20:25 < rcurtin[m]> yes, I am looking forward to it 😃 I don't plan on adding STB or catch to the matrix though :)

20:54 < shrit[m]> zoq: I thought exactly the same

20:55 < shrit[m]> il will be 5*15

20:58 < shrit[m]> The error here is strange right? http://ci.mlpack.org/job/aarch64_mlpack_tests/50/console

21:00 < rcurtin[m]> Do you mean the `--info` output?

21:00 < shrit[m]> yesw

21:00 < shrit[m]> Yes

21:00 < rcurtin[m]> I think that's a CLI11 test that's not suppressing output right. It still passes though

21:01 < shrit[m]> I know

21:01 < shrit[m]> You did not have that on your chromebook

21:01 < shrit[m]> I can not ssh to viking

21:01 < shrit[m]> I will try to run it on RPI

21:02 < zoq> shrit[m]: I can add you again. I did some changes.

21:03 < rcurtin[m]> I did have it on my chromebook, I just didn't paste that line 😃

21:04 < shrit[m]> fine, I just watned to check

21:05 < shrit[m]> build is green 💯 🙂

22:08 < rcurtin[m]> 🚀