jackdaniel changed the topic of #commonlisp to: Common Lisp, the #1=(programmable . #1#) programming language | Wiki: <https://www.cliki.net> | IRC Logs: <https://irclog.tymoon.eu/libera/%23commonlisp> | Cookbook: <https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook> | Pastebin: <https://plaster.tymoon.eu/> | News: ELS'22 this Monday (2022-03-21), see https://european-lisp-symposium.org
dra_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Posterdati has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
bilegeek has joined #commonlisp
Guest7432 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
notzmv has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
aeth has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Lord_of_Life has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Lord_of_Life has joined #commonlisp
aeth has joined #commonlisp
<Josh_2> yitzi: Guest74 has upgraded
waleee has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
cosimone has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
cosimone has joined #commonlisp
akoana has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
notzmv has joined #commonlisp
trumae has joined #commonlisp
<yitzi> Ha!
trumae has quit [Client Quit]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
Guest74 has joined #commonlisp
<mfiano> Hmm, I think I found another LOOP conformance problem I never knew about in MIT LOOP and derivatives. At the very least, it is probably a WSCL ammendment.
atgreen has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
atgreen has joined #commonlisp
<Bike> what is it?
<mfiano> Well
<mfiano> Given a form like: (loop for x = 1 initially (print x) repeat 3 collect x)
<mfiano> This prints NIL. However, unless I'm misunderstanding reading multiple sections of the standard that imply this should print 1, then it is not conforming, or needs to be better specified in WSCL
<mfiano> clhs 6.1.1.6
<mfiano> "The code for any initially clauses is collected into one progn in the order in which the clauses appear in the source. The collected code is executed once in the loop prologue after any implicit variable initializations."
pranavats has left #commonlisp [Error from remote client]
<mfiano> clhs 6.1.2.1
<mfiano> "All variables are initialized in the loop prologue."
<mfiano> "The iteration control clauses for, as, and repeat must precede any other loop clauses, except initially, with, and named"
<mfiano> clhs 6.1.7.2
<mfiano> "The initially construct causes the supplied compound-forms to be evaluated in the loop prologue, which precedes all loop code except for initial settings supplied by constructs with, for, or as. The code for any initially clauses is executed in the order in which the clauses appeared in the loop."
<mfiano> <end>
pranavats has joined #commonlisp
beach` is now known as beach
<beach> Good morning everyone!
<mfiano> Hello beach. Good timing. I was just mentioning a possible LOOP conformance issue and at the very least a WSCL entry.
<mfiano> I don't want to spam all those lines again, so you can read the log
<mfiano> Oh you were here, just under a different nick.
<mason> beach: o/
<beach> mfiano: I'll read it, but I am working on my coffee right now, so give me some time.
<mfiano> beach: Sure
<Bike> huh, i see. i've never actually used initially.
<mason> beach: Shameless plug for a good cause: https://www.cafefemenino.com/
<mfiano> If my reading is correct, both for and initially should be initialized sequentially by default in the prologue.
<beach> ecraven: What Bike said. Comments and such are read when the CST protocol is used, so then comments and other skipped things are returned as separate CSTs with their own types.
<mfiano> So why is it that I cannot access a previous value with initially?
<Bike> i haven't looked at it thoroughly but your logic makes sense to me.
<mfiano> I couldn't find any definition for "initialized" though. It doesn't actually say "bound".
<beach> mfiano: I'll consider it a potential WSCL issue. Thanks.
<mfiano> I wonder what SICL LOOP produces as a side effect
<beach> I can tell you. Give me a second...
<beach> It prints 1.
<mfiano> beach: Thanks. Because I could not define the word "initialized" in the context of the standard, I cannot tell if this is a conformance issue or just in need of some clarification. One could take it to mean "bound" or "storage allocated" or anything.
<mfiano> beach: SICL LOOP does what I would expect, but this is ambiguous as far as the standard goes.
<beach> I'll read it sometime after I finish my coffee.
<mfiano> I stumbled on this because I never actually used INITIALLY. I am currently iterating :IN a list and :FROM 0 in parallel, and doing something only when the latter is ZEROP. I thought I could simplify that logic by using INITIALLY, but it appears I cannot, at least not portably.
<mfiano> I just spent nearly an hour scrutinizing the standard. Time to go back to being productive.
lisp123 has joined #commonlisp
pranavats has left #commonlisp [Error from remote client]
lisp123 has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
pranavats has joined #commonlisp
akoana has joined #commonlisp
atgreen has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
atgreen has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
tyson2 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jealousm` has joined #commonlisp
jealousm` has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jealousmonk has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
aeth has quit [Quit: ...]
ttree_ has joined #commonlisp
masinter_ has joined #commonlisp
mbrndtgn8 has joined #commonlisp
fiddlerwoaroof_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
mister_m` has joined #commonlisp
mmk2410 has joined #commonlisp
mmk2410_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
subpsunym has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
mzan has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
ttree has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
mbrndtgn has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
mbrndtgn8 is now known as mbrndtgn
mister_m has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
fiddlerwoaroof has joined #commonlisp
masinter has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
nature has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Colleen has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
mzan has joined #commonlisp
Colleen has joined #commonlisp
nature has joined #commonlisp
subpsunym has joined #commonlisp
z4kz has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.5]
anticomputer has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
zak1 has joined #commonlisp
Bike has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
anticomputer has joined #commonlisp
zak1 is now known as z4kz
atgreen has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
trumae has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
akoana has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
mrcom has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rotateq has quit [Quit: ERC 5.4 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 28.1)]
mrcom has joined #commonlisp
aeth has joined #commonlisp
<ecraven> beach: what's the CST protocol?
pranavats has left #commonlisp [Error from remote client]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
Cymew has joined #commonlisp
irc_user has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
szkl has joined #commonlisp
bilegeek has quit [Quit: Leaving]
pranavats has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
pranavats has left #commonlisp [#commonlisp]
shka has joined #commonlisp
Posterdati has joined #commonlisp
rainthree has joined #commonlisp
ttree_ has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
Algernon69 has joined #commonlisp
olnw has joined #commonlisp
rotateq has joined #commonlisp
Algernon69 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
frgo has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
lottaquestions_ has joined #commonlisp
lottaquestions has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
akoana has joined #commonlisp
lottaquestions_ has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
prokhor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
lottaquestions_ has joined #commonlisp
retropikzel has joined #commonlisp
pranavats has joined #commonlisp
akoana has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
pve has joined #commonlisp
notzmv has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
scymtym has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
<beach> ecraven: Concrete Syntax Tree. It wraps the S-expressions in standard objects that contain other things too like source location information.
<ecraven> ah, thanks!
dre has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<beach> So then the class of the CST determines whether it is an atom, a CONS cell, a comment, or something else.
dre has joined #commonlisp
lottaquestions has joined #commonlisp
lottaquestions_ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
<beach> We use this in the SICL compiler to do source tracking. I think Clasp is doing the same thing.
<beach> And we use it in Second Climacs so that we don't skip comments and stuff when we read the contents of an editor buffer.
dre has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
<ecraven> so source code is not "just" a list any more, but more complex data structure
<beach> Exactly. Though not very complex. It has a 1-1 mapping to S-expressions, aside from comments and such.
<beach> The nesting is the same.
<ecraven> is this part of the eclector source code?
<beach> CST is in a separate repository, but the part of Eclector that uses it depends on that repository.
scymtym has joined #commonlisp
<ecraven> thanks for the link!
<beach> Sure.
<beach> I believe there is even some documentation.
attila_lendvai has joined #commonlisp
Brucio-61 has joined #commonlisp
azimut has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
irc_user has joined #commonlisp
<scymtym> just to be clear: a client can customize eclector to produce any kind of parse result. CSTs and the concrete syntax tree library are just one possibility that happens to be supported out of the box
<beach> Indeed, thanks for pointing that out.
<ecraven> so eclector is a reader that can call all sorts of constructors for whatever it's reading?
<beach> Absolutely.
<beach> In particular, you can configure it to not intern tokens that look like symbols.
<beach> And you can configure it to "intern" them in your own data structure.
<mfiano> It is one of the most interesting and useful Lisp projects in the last...well, a long time. I haven't had a chance to play with it much.
<ecraven> has beach written a paper about it that I might conveniently read?
<mfiano> scymtym gave a talk about it at OLM
<mfiano> Proably an accompanying paper but you'd have to ask him.
<rotateq> If I remember correctly there's also good documentation that ships with it.
<scymtym> https://s-expressionists.github.io/Eclector/ has all(?) the relevant references
<beach> mfiano: It was a necessity for SICL and Second Climacs to have something like that. But what used to be the SICL reader was quite embryonic compared to the finished product that scymtym turned it into.
<mfiano> beach: That's great. scymtym does a lot of really good work indeed.
<beach> Absolutely.
<ecraven> cool, thanks!
<beach> Too bad scymtym has a dayjob and a family. :)
<scymtym> interesting phrasing, but yeah :)
rogersm has joined #commonlisp
<jdz> scymtym: I'm happy you have a day job and a family :)
<scymtym> i mean, removing the family part from the discussion, i wouldn't mind doing CL stuff instead of dayjob, but that doesn't seem to be among the realistic possibilities
<beach> It could be, but it would not be without risk of course. I think it might be possible to gather enough financial support for the dayjob of one person. But I can't promise that of course.
<ecraven> beach: the problem is probably long-term viability, right? with a family, people probably plan for long-term job security, not just a few years or so
<beach> Exactly.
<ecraven> one of the tech billionaires should just donate a million or two a year to CL advancement :P
<beach> That would solve the problem for a decade or so, yes.
<beach> Or, we could convince the EU to cough up that amount.
<rotateq> If we argue it's good for agriculture, maybe then it's effective.
<beach> Now, you make me depressed.
<rotateq> beach: Sorry, didn't want that, but it seems to be one of EU's main concern for investement.
<beach> That's what's so depressing, yes.
<beach> But it's all off topic so let's drop it.
<rotateq> Of course.
sean has joined #commonlisp
sean has quit [Client Quit]
anticomputer has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
anticomputer has joined #commonlisp
<contrapunctus> scymtym: start a Lisp company? :> Pretty sure there will be a number of people willing to join. Make it remote, so you can have your pick of employees from across the world + cut down office costs.
<rotateq> I would need more time to get better and maybe join. :)
<rotateq> (but this is always based on reciprocity and a need)
jack_rabbit has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
<Shinmera> scymtym: I'm hoping to switch to a "minimal income by way of patreon/etc" model after Kandria is out. Then I could dedicate much more time for worthwhile Lisp things again instead of *gestures around* whatever it is I'm doing right now.
<rotateq> Shinmera: When will it be out again?
<Shinmera> Kickstarter is starting in almost to the minute a week from now.
<Shinmera> And final release is planned for November.
<rotateq> cool, so I can tell more people
<Shinmera> Please do :)
notzmv has joined #commonlisp
cosimone has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
cosimone has joined #commonlisp
<scymtym> Shinmera: i have considered something like that from time to time. i hope it will work for you
<Shinmera> In the long term I'm hoping for UBI, but that's a long shot :)
lisp123 has joined #commonlisp
lisp123 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
lisp123 has joined #commonlisp
lisp123 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
lisp123 has joined #commonlisp
treflip has joined #commonlisp
<flip214> Shinmera: at our age it'll be called "Rente" ;)
<Shinmera> If I can even pay enough in to get any :(
lisp123 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
random-nick has joined #commonlisp
lisp123 has joined #commonlisp
<lisp123> I was thinking of representing a buffer as follows: each line is a separate object, consisting of a string; the buffer is a vector of lines, when I want to add/remove lines, I create a new vector and reuse the unaffected lines
<Shinmera> Sounds expensive to add new lines at the beginning.
<lisp123> Shinmera: but as I'm storing each line as a separate object, I'd not be copying all the strings but a reference to each line
<Shinmera> Sure. You still need to copy the vector though.
<Shinmera> Very possible it's not a concern, though.
<lisp123> I should profile to see how expensive that is
<Shinmera> I thought beach implemented a protocol for buffers. Have you had a look at that?
<lisp123> Briefly yes, but it was too advanced for me
<scymtym> regarding immutable data structures for editors, i saw https://github.com/arximboldi/ewig at some point. didn't take a closer look yet
<lisp123> scymtym: oh thank you. I was going to raise the immutable point next
pfd has quit [Quit: Client closed]
irc_user has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
Oddity has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
szos has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tyson2 has joined #commonlisp
<beach> "too advanced"? Hmm.
hide-difference has quit [Quit: Client closed]
olnw has quit [Quit: olnw]
atgreen has joined #commonlisp
<lisp123> splay trees or something like that
<beach> The point is that the protocol is well defined, documented, and tested. The implementation should not be visible to client code.
igemnace has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<beach> lisp123: I guess you don't trust abstractions?
<lisp123> What would make you say that
<beach> Splay trees are part of the implementation, and since their existence is a problem to you, it must be the case that implementation details can make you reject a library.
atgreen has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
<lisp123> But I never said I rejected a library
<lisp123> In fact I was giving a compliment, and only wanted to do something simple on my end for my toy projects
<beach> My bad. It sure seemed like that. You are implementing your own, and not using this one because it is "too advanced".
<lisp123> No worries, not meant that way
<lisp123> I was playing around with immutability, and I barely understand binary trees on a good day
<beach> Why do you need to understand binary trees?
<lisp123> weren't you doing some sort of balancing of binary trees
<beach> I don't recall any sort of binary tree or balancing being mentioned in the protocol or in the documentation. It should be an implementation detail. So again, you seem to need to understand implementation details to use a library. That is why I hypothesized that you don't trust abstractions.
trumae has joined #commonlisp
<lisp123> oh my bad, looks like another implementation used splay trees
<beach> Cluffer USES splay trees. But they should not be EXPOSED TO CLIENT CODE as far as I know. If they are, then I have made a mistake in my documentation and/or in myh protocol design.
<lisp123> No they are definitely not. But as I said, I was playing around with buffer representations and immutability, not writing client code
<beach> I see.
<lisp123> The context was I was having a think of concurrency
<beach> So "too advanced" should have been "not immutable"?
<beach> Let's just drop it.
<lisp123> Well I don't fully understand how editors represent buffers, so I wouldn't know if yours was immutable or not
<lisp123> Is it? And would it be suitable for multiple users editing the same file (online collaboration)
<lisp123> The use of time stamps suggests something may be possible
<beach> It is not immutable. Simultaneous editing would be possible. A lock would have to be introduced on the line level to be used when a line is modified, and on the entire buffer when lines are inserted or deleted.
<Guest74> I would think you would want each person to have their own lines in a shared buffer to easily compare.
<jdz> Or maybe it would be time to read up on "Conflict-free Replicated Data Types"3.
<Guest74> is there are library for lisp?
causal has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.5]
<utis> does anyone happen to know how to finish a cl-readline line from lisp? (finish = the equivalent of pressing return in the console.) the doc. says that this can be done by setting *done* to non-nil, but that doesn't do anything.
susam has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
susam has joined #commonlisp
<lisp123> jdz: thanks for the link
<lisp123> beach: thanks for the explanation
atgreen has joined #commonlisp
Bike has joined #commonlisp
waleee has joined #commonlisp
atgreen has quit [Quit: Leaving]
lisp123 has quit [Quit: Leaving...]
Bike_ has joined #commonlisp
Bike has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
Bike_ is now known as Bike
attila_lendvai has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
varjag has joined #commonlisp
rotateq has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<utis> (nevermind)
Brucio-61 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
Brucio-61 has joined #commonlisp
treflip has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Brucio-61 has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
Brucio-61 has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
treflip has joined #commonlisp
livoreno has joined #commonlisp
trumae has joined #commonlisp
Fare has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
fitzsim has joined #commonlisp
trumae has joined #commonlisp
waleee has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
varjag has quit [Quit: ERC 5.4.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 29.0.50)]
ttree_ has joined #commonlisp
frgo has joined #commonlisp
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
tyson2 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
azimut has joined #commonlisp
trumae has joined #commonlisp
misko has joined #commonlisp
misko has quit [Client Quit]
misko has joined #commonlisp
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
misko has quit [Quit: Leaving]
rodicm has joined #commonlisp
attila_lendvai has joined #commonlisp
rodicm has quit [Client Quit]
karlosz has joined #commonlisp
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
treflip has quit [Quit: Quit]
ebrasca has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
rotateq has joined #commonlisp
rodicm has joined #commonlisp
rodicm has quit [Quit: Leaving]
anticomputer has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
anticomputer has joined #commonlisp
Fare has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
Dynom has joined #commonlisp
jolby has joined #commonlisp
mister_m` is now known as mister_m
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
tyson2 has joined #commonlisp
rainthree has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Fare has joined #commonlisp
rainthree has joined #commonlisp
tyson2 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dmc00 has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
trumae has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
mrcom has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
azimut has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
pfd has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mrcom has joined #commonlisp
trumae has joined #commonlisp
azimut has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
aartaka has joined #commonlisp
trumae has joined #commonlisp
Oddity has joined #commonlisp
kpoeck has joined #commonlisp
akoana has joined #commonlisp
kpoeck has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
dale_ has joined #commonlisp
griffinmb_ has joined #commonlisp
neominimum_ has joined #commonlisp
pl_ has joined #commonlisp
Guest74 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
energizer_ has joined #commonlisp
jaimelm_ has joined #commonlisp
analogsalad has joined #commonlisp
griffinmb has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
_death has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
pl has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
neominimum has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
dale has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
Duuqnd has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
jaimelm has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
energizer has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
neominimum_ is now known as neominimum
ioa has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
griffinmb_ is now known as griffinmb
dale_ is now known as dale
pl_ is now known as pl
ioa_ has joined #commonlisp
rainthree has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
adeht has joined #commonlisp
opcode has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
Posterdati has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
opcode has joined #commonlisp
kpoeck has joined #commonlisp
Brucio-61 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Duuqnd has joined #commonlisp
scymtym has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
rotateq has quit [Quit: ERC 5.4 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 28.1)]
akoana_ has joined #commonlisp
kpoeck has quit [Quit: Client closed]
orestarod has joined #commonlisp
Brucio-61 has joined #commonlisp
scymtym has joined #commonlisp
akoana has quit [Quit: leaving]
akoana_ has quit [Quit: leaving]
akoana has joined #commonlisp
szkl has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<utis> is there a reason for alexandria's lack of if-let*?
<White_Flame> because there's not really a singular 'else'
kpoeck has joined #commonlisp
<utis> sorry, why not? wouldn't that just be the 3rd argument as with if-let?
analogsalad has quit [Quit: bye]
<White_Flame> each binding clause would be tested to fail in order, instead of in parallel
<White_Flame> but yeah, an if-let* could be created wher all failures pop to the else clause
Cymew has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
dmc00 has joined #commonlisp
cosimone has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Dynom has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.5]
waleee has joined #commonlisp
<Shinmera> me no likey any of those test-and-bind thingies.
<Shinmera> double that if they're anaphoric
kpoeck has quit [Quit: Client closed]
kpoeck has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
<ecraven> how do I read all forms in a file, until EOF and gather them in a list?
<ecraven> is there anything like `read-file', or is it loop to the rescue?
<ecraven> ah, can't actually do that, there are package names in the dump where the packages don't exist :-/
<ecraven> any way to tell read to just not intern *anything* it is reading?
kpoeck has quit [Quit: kpoeck]
shka has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
cosimone has joined #commonlisp
attila_lendvai has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
aartaka has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<mfiano> ecraven: uiop:read-file-forms, and nope.
<ecraven> thanks ;)
jmdaemon has joined #commonlisp
<Nilby> *read-intern* advocacy
orestarod has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
waleee has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
waleee has joined #commonlisp
Guest74 has joined #commonlisp
pve has quit [Quit: leaving]
waleee has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
cosimone has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
cosimone has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
X-Scale has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
ebrasca has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
karlosz_ has joined #commonlisp
karlosz80 has joined #commonlisp
tyson2 has joined #commonlisp
karlosz has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
dre has joined #commonlisp
karlosz_ has quit [Client Quit]
karlosz80 has quit [Client Quit]
karlosz has joined #commonlisp
karlosz has quit [Client Quit]
karlosz has joined #commonlisp
X-Scale has joined #commonlisp
utis has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
jolby has quit [Quit: Client closed]
utis_ has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
trumae has joined #commonlisp
igemnace has joined #commonlisp
trumae has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
trumae has joined #commonlisp