<norayr>
folks, i booted leste on droid, and got info about april update.
<norayr>
at the end of the text it recommends to remove old zram cotfiguration
<norayr>
with rc-update del zram atd then on the same line, rm /etc/init.d/zram
<norayr>
So i was wondering (btw now i write from leste's pidgin) should i run those probably o separate lines, and if i do, wouldn't it just remove the serice startup script?
<norayr>
But wasn't the intention to run the init script?
<norayr>
Oh, i mean to run on startup
joerg has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
joerg has joined #maemo-leste
<norayr>
other question is, i noticed that the boot option was mentioned which allows droid to charge.
<norayr>
isn't it in boot loader? and that bootloader is separate from leste image.
<norayr>
so leste image update won't reveal that option for me right?
<Wizzup>
freemangordon: hm, we should look into that problem @ apparmor
<Wizzup>
freemangordon: I think we want to suppor tapparmor
<Wizzup>
freemangordon: sorry I thought have thought of it being apparmor before
<Wizzup>
it's always the MAC once DAC ought to work
arno11 has joined #maemo-leste
arno11 has left #maemo-leste [#maemo-leste]
xmn has joined #maemo-leste
<freemangordon>
Wizzup: still, now I have 'fixed' my VM to behave like PP I will investigate why ssl upgrade broke it
Twig has joined #maemo-leste
Livio has joined #maemo-leste
* enyc
meows :O
<enyc>
I'm wondering if n900 usb get damaged with these bypassing of the micro-usb protection-circuit etc going stroight over to the 2 pins under board
<freemangordon>
but, TBH I am not sure the commit is wrong
<freemangordon>
but my openssl-fu is not the best around :)
<freemangordon>
ok, so telepathy-gabble (wocky) wants to do tls1.0, which is disabled by policy
<freemangordon>
enabling tls1.0 is not very good idea IMO
<sicelo>
enyc: maybe #maemo. I think it can get damaged, yes. That said ... i did exactly that bypass on my old n900 back in 2015 ... still perfectly fine today (only non-working modem, which is unrelated)
<Wizzup>
got the n900 serial module back :)
<Wizzup>
freemangordon: why does wocky only do 1.0 ?
<Wizzup>
freemangordon: I think I fixed this in some other pkgs that I forward ported
<Wizzup>
it's a bug to request only 1.0
<freemangordon>
agree
<freemangordon>
so I changed it to request 1.2
<freemangordon>
(for 1.3 google presents some strange certificate)
<freemangordon>
Wizzup: will push the fix in a minute
<Wizzup>
what is strange about it, and yes at least 1.2 is ok, 1.3 would be better