guerby has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
guerby has joined #fedora-riscv
zsun has joined #fedora-riscv
davidlt_ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
davidlt_ has joined #fedora-riscv
esv has joined #fedora-riscv
davidlt_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
<somlo>
davidlt[m]: good to hear CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME shouldn't even have been enabled -- saves us the trouble of finding/fixing that particular kernel bug :)
<somlo>
the idea is, once we have a full list that cause me problems on litex/rocket, you decide which ones need to be kept enabled, and I have to debug them; the rest I'm happy to ignore :D
davidlt_ has joined #fedora-riscv
<davidlt[m]>
somlo: well there is definitely a bug in the kernel, but it shouldn't enabled in Fedora :)
<davidlt[m]>
somlo: just to double check. You are working on find another one, correct?
<davidlt[m]>
I will wait for that too before spinning a new kernel.
<somlo>
yeah, I'm still testing my way through the list of suspects; so far it's CONFIG_PRINTK_INDEX and CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME (independently of each other); but hold off making decisions based on my input until I've made it through the whole list
<davidlt[m]>
Oh, I missed CONFIG_PRINTK_INDEX
<davidlt[m]>
It's another redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_PRINTK_INDEX Note, that nothing overrides it at all.
<davidlt[m]>
Seems pretty stable thing.
<davidlt[m]>
Config wise this one looks okay.
<somlo>
right, so I'll have to figure out why it causes a crash for me -- which is perfectly fine
<davidlt[m]>
bisection again :)
<somlo>
this time the real kind, I hope :)
<davidlt[m]>
I wonder if this is just one problem or multiple problems combined in a mix.
<davidlt[m]>
somlo: how many more CONFIG_* options there are for you to test?
zsun has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
jednorozec has quit [Excess Flood]
jednorozec has joined #fedora-riscv
<somlo>
I'll know later this afternoon (by the time it's morning again in your time zone) -- once I get back in front of my "real" computer
<somlo>
but I could always just boldly re-enable all the remaining ones and see if they work -- and only go back to one-at-a-time if the experiment fails :)
<somlo>
the equivalent of "speculative execution" :D :D
davidlt_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
davidlt_ has joined #fedora-riscv
<djdelorie>
davidlt[m]: I hadn't planned on a libffi 3.4.4 backport to F37 but if you need it I can put it on the "please consider" list
<djdelorie>
davidlt[m]: the canonical way to request a backport is a bugzilla bug
<djdelorie>
but I'll mention it to Carlos too
<davidlt[m]>
djdelorie: I can make bugzilla ticket, but just wanted to see if it's already planned or something.
<davidlt[m]>
Sometimes things from Rawhide happen to show up in older releases after quite some time.
<davidlt[m]>
Not strongly needed, but would be nice to have. The most important bit is that it's already in Rawhide.
<djdelorie>
understood. libffi has had a rocky path to today, we've been careful about breaking ABI, but hopefully we're almost past that
<djdelorie>
gimme a bit to hear back from Carlos, a bz might not be needed
<djdelorie>
Carlos is testing a backport already
<davidlt[m]>
All GCC 13 builds continue to cook, 70+ hours mark passed.