11:55 <angry_vincent> does foot using GPU accelaration as compared to alacritty/kitty?

11:56 <dnkl> angry_vincent: no, foot is software/CPU only

11:56 <angry_vincent> oh, ok, thank you

14:47 <Nulo> Does 1.10.2/3 have fixes for senpai-related issues?

14:47 <Nulo> angry_vincent: If it helps, in my experience it's really fast anyway

14:48 <angry_vincent> yes, it is fast

14:48 <Nulo> Finally a useful backtrace https://0x0.st/orTN.sigsegv

14:54 <dnkl> Nulo: there are no known issues with 1.10.3.

14:54 <dnkl> 1.10.2

14:54 <dnkl> has known issues

14:55 <dnkl> which version is your backtrace from?

14:55 <Nulo> dnkl, 1.10.1

14:55 <Nulo> That's what I was asking, "does .2 or .3 contain fixes for that kind of stuff". I guess I'll have to send a patch to aports

14:55 <dnkl> angry_vincent: yeah, we often achieve lower latencies, faster frame rendering times, and higher throughput than at least alacritty. But not always. Each terminal has its strong and weak sides...

14:56 <dnkl> Nulo: thanks... just wanted to be sure you hadn't found a new issue...

14:56 <angry_vincent> dnkl: of course :)

15:00 <dnkl> Nulo: isn't aports alpine? Thought they we're already on 1.10.3...

15:00 <Nulo> dnkl, yes, edge is on 1.10.3 but 3.15 is on 1.10.1 for some reason

15:00 <Nulo> Patch sent https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/28849

15:00 <dnkl> ah

15:06 <Nulo> >

15:06 <Nulo> PaperColorDark and PaperColorLight themes renamed to paper-color-dark and paper-color-light, for consistency with other theme names.

15:06 <Nulo> That's marked as a "change" but it is breaking, no?

15:07 <dnkl> hmm, yeah, I guess, if someone has a config that pulls it in through an include

15:08 <dnkl> but that's in the "unreleased" section. I.e. that's a change that wont be backported to 1.10.x