dnkl changed the topic of #foot to: Foot - fast, lightweight and minimalistic Wayland terminal emulator || 1.10.3 || https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot || channel logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/foot
alebastr has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.3]
alebastr has joined #foot
an3223 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.3]
an3223 has joined #foot
cvmn has joined #foot
rcf is now known as DanglingKiller
DanglingKiller is now known as rcf
cvmn has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
k-man has joined #foot
<k-man> hi
<manio> hi
<k-man> i copied the sample config from the website. but when i launch a new foot, i get error: /home/jason/.config/foot/foot.ini:37: invalid section name: bell
<k-man> hi manio
<k-man> v 1.6.4 +ime from debian bullseye
<dnkl> the web page's example is for the latest version, 1.10
<novakane> k-man: that's because the separate bell section was added in a later version, 1.8
<k-man> oh
<dnkl> doesn't Debian package the example file as part of the foot package?
<k-man> i couldn't see it
<k-man> let me check
<k-man> oh yes it is there thanks
<k-man> i thought sample config files usually go in /usr/share/doc/<package>/
<k-man> so i only looked there
<k-man> i could be wrong about that though
<dnkl> no idea, it's up to the distribution :)
<k-man> can i build it from source easily?
<dnkl> I think so. I don't run Debian myself.
<k-man> ok, managed to build and install it
<k-man> that was pretty painless
<w0rm> I wonder if k-man is going to hit some runtime issues wrt old fcft or other libs ...
<k-man> w0rm: seems to be working so far
<w0rm> k-man: what's the fcft version?
<w0rm> though I guess if you mostly deal with ascii and no weird glyphs it might not make that much of a difference
<k-man> w0rm: how can i tell? i'm not sure what fcft is
<w0rm> I have never bothered to remember dpkg/apt stuff so I can't tell you - I'd have to google. fcft is one of the libraries foot depends on
<k-man> libfcft3/stable,now 2.3.1-1 amd64 [installed]
<dnkl> k-man: foot may have built against a later fcft, if the system version was too old. Check foot's log output, it'll say which fcft version it's using
<w0rm> meson really is a gread build system :-)
<k-man> i have met the author of meson a couple of times
<k-man> fcft.c:304: fcft: 1.10.3-87-g027603cb
<dnkl> hmm, I think that means it's an old fcft version
<dnkl> it picked up foot's version, not it's own
<k-man> info: fcft.c:304: fcft: 1.10.3-87-g027603cb (Dec 21 2021, branch 'master') -graphemes -runs +assertions
<dnkl> either that, or we have a bug in the version generation scripts
<w0rm> or both! :-D
<dnkl> build date is today
<dnkl> so probably latest fcft, but it's reporting a buggy version
<w0rm> yeah, but should fcft report its version as foots version
<w0rm> yeah
<dnkl> nope
<k-man> is fcft related to fontconfig?
<dnkl> it uses fontconfig and Freetype to rasterized font glyphs
<k-man> well so far it's working for me
<dnkl> awesome!
<dnkl> I'll try to remember to take a look at the version issue later
<Arnavion> fcft version is reported correctly for me with foot in a debian:11-slim container
<Arnavion> ( https://paste.rs/1kT )
<dnkl> Arnavion: in this case, the "problem" if most likely that a newer fcft was pulled in as a subproject, and foot linked statically against that.
<dnkl> And for some reason, fcft's version script picked up the parent project's (foot) version
<dnkl> version issue should be fixed now
amk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amk has joined #foot
amk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amk has joined #foot
amk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amk has joined #foot
amk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amk has joined #foot
amk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
amk has joined #foot