04:18 <Arnavion> dnkl: In the case where the terminfos are renamed to not collide with ncurses', is it supposed to be foot-extra-direct or foot-direct-extra ?

06:39 <dnkl> Arnavion: I've used foot-extra-direct (unless I've made a mistake somewhere)

06:45 <ambasta> dnkl, renaming default terminfo to xtern-foot (like kitty), might help with applications that test for xterm-* for color etc support

06:46 <ambasta> Will also avoid conflict w/ ncurses terminfo which ships as terminfo/f/foot

06:48 <Arnavion> dnkl: Okay, I need to fix the OpenSUSE package then. When are you planning to release .1 with the config parsing fix? I'm asking so I can decide if I should wait or fix both now

06:51 <dnkl> Arnavion: I'd say somewhere around this weekend. If possible I'd like to resolve https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/801 first

06:52 <dnkl> ambasta: that has been discussed, but decided against. Can't find the issue link atm though

06:52 <Arnavion> Okay

06:52 <ambasta> Aight, thanks for the response

06:54 <dnkl> I think it came down to two things: one is that that kind of name goes against the naming rules for terminfo, but more importantly, we don't want to automatically be treated as xterm, since we don't implement everything that xterm does

06:54 <ambasta> I'm guessing https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/549#issuecomment-202077