12:29 <marex> qschulz: you OK with me picking up https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=442232 ?

12:31 <qschulz> marex: nothing against it as I cannot test it

12:45 <marex> qschulz: can you do a RB or something, so I won't be applying my own unreviewed patches ?

12:46 <marex> qschulz: and uh ... you can test it eventually, right ?

12:46 <marex> qschulz: at least that was the plan, do the rockchip board implementation and see how it goes ?

12:47 <qschulz> marex: my plan was you merging this and when I get time and motivation for testing on Rockchip, I do it :)

12:48 <qschulz> or someone else does it :)

12:50 <marex> Tartarus: you OK with that ^ in master still, or do you want it in next ? It is mostly platform code, so it should be fine, but ... let me know

12:51 <marex> qschulz: OK ... and uh, I have RB from Tom anyway, so maybe it is fine

13:38 <Tartarus> marex: lets throw it at next please, thanks

13:42 <marex> Tartarus: it was posted way before 2025.01 was even released, and it is hooks + platform code, and not having that in would make the platform I care about unusable in 2025.04 ... hum ...

13:54 <sjg1> Tartarus: Thanks for taking that patch. I think that means custodians will be able to use my lab if they want to try something out on a board

14:11 <Tartarus> Yes, that particular change was cleaning up what was missed when making the whole pipeline stage optional.

14:11 <Tartarus> sjg1: Are you going to join the call today, or no because it won't likely be a mostly video chat?

14:29 <sjg1> Tartarus: Yes I can join, at least for 30mins. Any chance we could have an agenda / running doc as well as the meeting notes?

14:48 <Tartarus> sjg1: I'll make it clearer people should propose topics ahead of time, moving forward. The agenda is just otherwise what do people want to raise, and was there anything important missing from yesterdays release

14:59 <Tartarus> I've started it now: https://meet.google.com/btj-wgcg-euw

15:03 <apalos> Tartarus: apologies, I can't join today I am at an internal meeting

15:03 <Tartarus> apalos: OK, thanks.

15:54 <Slimey> 9600 baud should be enough for everybody

16:03 <marex> Tartarus: is it still going ?

16:03 <Tartarus> marex: just ended

16:03 <marex> lovely

16:03 <Tartarus> off by an hour? :(

16:03 <marex> Tartarus: off by a busy elsewhere ...

16:03 <Tartarus> Ah

16:04 <marex> Tartarus: as for the tfa patches, can I convince you for 2025.04 ?

16:05 <Tartarus> Oh I don't know, maybe? Another call atm.

17:47 <shadow> Tartarus: I missed the call, was wondering since (with the LwIP fix for dual network) LwIP behaves slightly better for JH7110 targets if we wanted that for this release cycle but the merge window is closed now; and if there was anything specific anticipated for this release cycle that needs to get smoothed out for JH7110 target besides the upstream Linux dts sync from U-Boot to Linux...

17:49 <shadow> ... and since there is Chinese New Year (Spring Festival) with those platform devs having been busy we did not see a response yet for the final small changes to the JH7110 cadence usb patch series I was hoping would make it, but again missed the window. Nothing too alarming, just some wishlist things to move the ideas forward that are proposed some time ago

18:51 <Tartarus> shadow: An action item for me is to check in with Jerome about sending a PR with the assorted lwip fixes we have for the release.

20:08 <shadow> ok :)

22:19 <logicalerzor> hi, im curious if the channel would instead be moved to OFTC? that way i can connect with my Matrix account (seems like libera.chat and matrix stopped the bridge)