othx has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
othx has joined #openscad
mmu_man has joined #openscad
mmu_man has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mmu_man has joined #openscad
snakedGT has joined #openscad
snakedLX has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
snakedLX has joined #openscad
snakedGT has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
Guest66 has joined #openscad
<Guest66>
Hey, I just wanted to ask, why doesn
<Guest66>
't openscad releases binaries anymore? the latest was at 2021
<InPhase>
There are sometimes release gaps. 2015-2019 was one.
<InPhase>
But it's getting to be time I think.
<InPhase>
The recent release schedule I think was 2015, 2019, 2021, and now I hope 2024. Every 2 years would have been a better target to aim for, but there have been a ton of major changes, and sorting out the right threshold point before the next release is kind of important. It would be best for the project to get Manifold front and center for this next release, as that will be game changing.
<Guest66>
Thanks for your response, does it worth it to compile latest release? or 2021 is just good enough?
J24k44 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
J24k44 has joined #openscad
<Scopeuk>
there are more recent snap show builds avaliable on the website if you would like to try it
<Scopeuk>
the most recent builds include the manifold experimental feature which has a significant performance benifit
<Scopeuk>
experimental features have to be manually enabled on the snapshot builds in preferences
snakedGT has joined #openscad
snakedLX has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
snakedGT has quit [Quit: Leaving]
J24k44 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
J24k44 has joined #openscad
killjoy has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
killjoy has joined #openscad
killjoy has quit [Changing host]
killjoy has joined #openscad
J24k44 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
J24k44 has joined #openscad
arogora has joined #openscad
killjoy has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
arogora is now known as killjoy
killjoy has quit [Changing host]
killjoy has joined #openscad
sidilakies has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
TheCoffeMaker has quit [Quit: So long and thanks for all the fish]
TheCoffeMaker has joined #openscad
vukung has joined #openscad
<InPhase>
kintel: I checked your error report and it seems to be riddled with failures still, but I don't see the alpha images. So I guess the 8 worked on the CI, and left you with the other issues?
zauberfisch has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
zauberfisch has joined #openscad
mmu_man has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<vukung>
Hi! I would like to scale a rotational extrusion by a number depending on the rotation angle (e.g. scale by 1+sin(phi)/2). Is there an easy way to do this?
<buZz>
i did such just by doing tiny linearextrudes in a for loop
<buZz>
and doing the rotate() myself :)
<vukung>
I see .. an approximation, but that could work as well, thanks
<vukung>
but how would you join the extrusions into one object?
<vukung>
I could create a polyhedron, but for that I need to access the vertices of the polygons
J24k44 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
J24k44 has joined #openscad
RonRN has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mmu_man has joined #openscad
mmu_man has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
mmu_man has joined #openscad
pca006132 has joined #openscad
teepee_ has joined #openscad
mmu_man has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
teepee has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
teepee_ is now known as teepee
mmu_man has joined #openscad
pca006132 has quit [Quit: pca006132]
pca006132 has joined #openscad
<J24k44>
vukung yes that is the problem - there is some discussion about extracting the points from a 2D shape
<J24k44>
in the meantime you can use a chained hull for convex shapes
<InPhase>
vukung: The (5+5*(1+cos(8*t*360))/2) there is equivalent to your 1+sin(phi)/2
<InPhase>
The effect is basically a teething-ring like shape.
<vukung>
Yes, this is very close to what I need - my only problem is that I want to shell my model, so I try to rotate an offset polygon. But using offset() I do not have access to the polygon vertices.
<vukung>
(But maybe there is a better way to shell with a fixed width ...?)
J24k44 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
J24k44 has joined #openscad
<InPhase>
It is unusual to want to shell something but also vary its size sinusoidally. Can I ask the application? (There might be an xy problem here.)
<vukung>
I'm trying to construct a container with a wavy surface (which is good for heat conduction)
<peepsalot>
vukung have you heard of gyroids?
<vukung>
yes
<peepsalot>
they are pretty optimal if you are designing a heat exchanger
<vukung>
maybe, but we are looking at the aesthetics as well :) thank for the input though
mmu_man has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
<InPhase>
vukung: Is your shell shape extremely complicated? There are a lot of ways to approximate a polygonal shape very closely, and that would probably achieve your objective. If you're already planning to vary it, you are probably not seeking a snug fit.
<InPhase>
vukung: If you wanted to show the shape, we might be able to advise on how to approximate it, as one solution path.
mmu_man has joined #openscad
<vukung>
In the meantime I've done it "manually": the profiles are Bezier curves, so I computed the derivative and from that the offset at the sampled points