ChanServ changed the topic of #mlpack to: "mlpack: a fast, flexible machine learning library :: We don't always respond instantly, but we will respond; please be patient :: Logs at http://www.mlpack.org/irc/
ib07 has joined #mlpack
ib07 has quit [Client Quit]
< _slack_mlpack_19> Hi, i am trying to build mlpack from source(main branch in github). Bt while building the mlpack_test, it is consuming a lot of memory(around 5gb) and time.
< _slack_mlpack_19> System config: ubuntu 20.04, i5 8th gen, 8gb ram and 16gb swap
< AvikantSrivasta7> Use the option 'make j1' to build it one core
< _slack_mlpack_19> Its consuming same amount of memory even after using j1
ImQ009 has joined #mlpack
< jonpsy[m]> Hey, is using stl algorithms like ```std::generate``` or ```std:fill``` more cache friendly than raw loops?
< AyushSingh[m]> I have made all the changes I could think of in <https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/2822> , looking for its review.
< AyushSingh[m]> (edited) ... looking for its ... => ... looking forward to its ...
< turska79Gitter[m> @zoq Thank you
Shashank has joined #mlpack
Shashank has quit [Client Quit]
< rcurtin[m]1> finally got through to the GT group that hosts dealgood (one of the build servers) and managed to get a time set up to go in and fight with it to get it back online... only took a year+ 😃
< shrit[m]> ryan: great news
< shrit[m]> Hope that the issue with the server is not going to be complicated to resolve
< shrit[m]> probably booting issue
< shrit[m]> or out of power
< rcurtin[m]1> I know what the issue is---it has a connected Apple FastRAID that has died
< rcurtin[m]1> but the FastRAID doesn't actually matter
< rcurtin[m]1> so I'm just going to disconnect the FastRAID and get it running again
< rcurtin[m]1> in fact the FastRAID was never actually hooked up to the machine even when we built it in 2010...
< shrit[m]> Are you able to ssh to it?
< shrit[m]> I mean what make you sure that it is related to FastRAID?
< rcurtin[m]1> no, it's not booting right now; I think it refuses to boot because the FastRAID is throwing an error
< rcurtin[m]1> I managed to get someone to physically look at the system a year ago and that's what they said they were seeing as BIOS messages
< shrit[m]> I see, it was possible for him to do the fix right?
< rcurtin[m]1> he said he didn't have time and had to focus on other things
< rcurtin[m]1> it'll be easy for me to go in and fight with it; it's right down the street
< rcurtin[m]1> like a 10 minute walk
< jonpsy[m]> hey rcurtin
< jonpsy[m]> remember that grammar fix PR I made? can we merge it directly please? I've opened another PR for optimizing NSGA2 (I've tagged you as well). Good day!
< rcurtin[m]1> sure, I will take a look when I have a chance 👍️
< jonpsy[m]> yeah and one more thing..
< jonpsy[m]> the CI is telling me to update History.MD, but I've seen other grammar fix PR not doing it and still passing checks. Am I missing something? thanks !
< rcurtin[m]1> can you link to another grammar fix PR where it passes the checks?
< jonpsy[m]> Ah, my bad. I saw madhavshah's PR merged, so I thought it passed the checks
< rcurtin[m]1> personally I don't mind ignoring the history check for something as simple as a tiny grammar fix
< jonpsy[m]> +1 on that. Very well, see you on my Improved NSGA2 PR :D
< shrit[m]> rcurtin: I fixed the same seed for random number generator. I expected to have the same analysis of the tree
< shrit[m]> But the number are different in both trees
< jjb[m]> Not quite deterministic 😢
< zoq> shrit[m]: Is that on the same system?
< zoq> shrit[m]: It's not guaranteed that you get the same random numbers across systems using the same seed.
< zoq> shrit[m]: Just noted it's not the same armadillo version so I guess it's not the same system.
< shrit[m]> It is running on the same system
< shrit[m]> but one is statically linked, and transfered
< shrit[m]> while the other is locally build on viking
< zoq> Do you generate the dataset randomly as well?
< shrit[m]> I fixed the same seed for both case, therefore I think that the series of the dataset is random but it should be the same right?
< shrit[m]> and if it is the same, the output here should be the same
< zoq> I would either use a static dataset or check if the generated dataset is the same, just to be sure.
< shrit[m]> the issue is that the dataset is 5*100
< shrit[m]> so writing that manually is an issue.
< shrit[m]> I will try to print he dataset
< zoq> You could generate it once save it and load it back in?
< shrit[m]> good idea
< shrit[m]> I will try to execute this time on my RPI instead of transferring to viking
< shrit[m]> and compare with the viking dynamic linked library
< shrit[m]> I see now what is happening
< shrit[m]> there is the querySet that is randomly generated
< shrit[m]> but they should be using the same seed right?
< shrit[m]> I will just print out everything and see what happens
< shrit[m]> Just to note: I executed each one on a different machine, neither the dataset or the queryset look similar
< shrit[m]> In this case, I have to send the binaries to viking to compare them
< rcurtin[m]1> you might be better off just computing a random dataset and saving it to CSV, then adapting the test to load the data from CSV
< shrit[m]> Totally agreed,
travis-ci has joined #mlpack
< travis-ci> mlpack/ensmallen#1148 (2.16.1 - d3b6f67 : Ryan Curtin): The build passed.
travis-ci has left #mlpack []
ImQ009 has quit [Quit: Leaving]