ChanServ changed the topic of #mlpack to: "mlpack: a fast, flexible machine learning library :: We don't always respond instantly, but we will respond; please be patient :: Logs at http://www.mlpack.org/irc/
< AakashkaushikGit>
@zoq haha, sure no worries. Take your time with it.
< AndrewSpottGitte>
@ryan: have you had a chance to look at the finalizers for the MLModels?
< rcurtin[m]>
@spott yesterday blew up on me, but I did read about them. I think it should be pretty easy to include them---I hope to have a chance to do that today; we'll see if the time is available
< jjb[m]>
Huge congratulations folks on MLPACK being accepted on CRAN. If you have a twitter, join in the celebration:
< rcurtin[m]>
jjb: I thought this day would never come! :) awesome work yashwants19 !!
< rcurtin[m]>
I have a PR to open with some quick changes to pass the R checks; I'll try to open it later today. I had to generate a giant list of `Authors@R` using CMake to parse `COPYRIGHT.txt`...
< jeffin143[m]>
Github got a night mode
< jeffin143[m]>
Yaaaaaaaaa
< jeffin143[m]>
I love it
< rcurtin[m]>
nice, I used to use a plugin for that and it was flaky because it didn't apply until after the page loaded... so the whole page would flash bright white then turn black
< jeffin143[m]>
The aesthetic are much nice
< jeffin143[m]>
rcurtin (@ryan:ratml.org): do we have discussion tab enabled for mlpack
< jeffin143[m]>
GitHub recently released discussion tab for a repo
< rcurtin[m]>
team discussions are enabled, if that's what you mean, but otherwise we've used this chat channel
< jeffin143[m]>
Yeah team discussion , I have seen
< jeffin143[m]>
But there is now a repo discussion too
< rcurtin[m]>
we already have lots of ways to have discussions, so it seems to me like enabling that would overlap with what we already have going here in this room and with the team discussions and issues
< jeffin143[m]>
Yeah
< jeffin143[m]>
Current we use issues
< jeffin143[m]>
Like for discussing about
< jeffin143[m]>
How to make java bindings
< jeffin143[m]>
Or what to use instead of boost spirit
< rcurtin[m]>
yeah, I think issues works okay for this right now but I agree it's not perfect... maybe let's wait and see for a while where the new feature goes, and if it doesn't change much, sees good adoption, and doesn't become too complicated, we can give it a shot?
< rcurtin[m]>
mostly my concern is just not to fragment the community across too many different tools :)
< jeffin143[m]>
:)
< shrit[m]>
I can see it, it is not bad, it would be great if we can vary the background color as well
< jeffin143[m]>
Ok auto merge feature came out of the box
< jeffin143[m]>
Now as soon as the requirements are met it will auto merge
< jeffin143[m]>
Although if you don't want for a particular pr you can force not to auto merge :)