00:14 <byteit101[m]> totao number of jrubyfx module opens: 184

00:28 <byteit101[m]> JRubyFX 2.0 released!

00:30 <byteit101[m]> headius: releasing that was the last of the 4 things that needed to be done for the blog post. Post it whenever (might be good to have someone run through the code to make sure it works first, though)

00:31 <byteit101[m]> enebo: ^ 2.0 released

00:32 <byteit101[m]> only took about 6 years since the last release :-)

00:44 <headius> That's a lot of modules

00:45 <headius> Congratulations 🎉

01:12 <byteit101[m]> Indeed quite a lot, hence my asking about them a few days ago

01:13 <byteit101[m]> *8 modules, but 184 module opens (module X package)

01:19 <headius> Any idea how many of those are just for protected calls?

01:22 <byteit101[m]> I probably could grab javaparser to find out and clean it up a bit, but I just did the commands here: https://github.com/jruby/jrubyfx/wiki/Getting-Started#java-modules-using-java-9

01:25 <byteit101[m]> so to answer your question: no. that's literally everything that could be, not reduced to the necessary

01:26 <byteit101[m]> on various apps I've actually developed, it's varied between 2 and 6 add-opens, so I figured I'd play it safe by adding everything :-)

01:48 <headius> Ok I get that

23:49 <Freaky> sigh

23:50 <Freaky> my git revision walker code keeps crashing with "invalid byte sequence in UTF-8"

23:50 <Freaky> but walking every single revision in a test script is fine

23:59 <Freaky> "3eb67b534cab6a78b44b13e4323fd60353003089 (\x98\xF6\x90V\b~3)\n"

23:59 <Freaky> k, that's more coherent than I was anticipating