<whitequark[m]>
i mean that's still above and beyond what other tools in this range can do
<whitequark[m]>
at the point you're in sub-nanosecond regimen you're going to have trouble with like, the rest of your glitching kit
<ldcd[m]>
And tbf I'm putting it through like 9db of attenuation so that I don't damage the front end of this old scope so I don't know if I'm hitting 5 volts
<ldcd[m]>
Yeah
<whitequark[m]>
oh i'm pretty sure it's not
<whitequark[m]>
but you could definitely use that to control a FET or something
<ldcd[m]>
Yes absolutely
<ldcd[m]>
I have some fast comparators around here, I'll give it a test when work calms down
<ldcd[m]>
The PLL delay lines are very handy for getting ~100ps control
<ldcd[m]>
And can probably do better than that if you use the first pll to output a high frequency and then divide it down with the second
tec has quit [Quit: bye!]
tec has joined #glasgow
bvernoux has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<whitequark[m]>
you know what would be really funny?
<whitequark[m]>
to make a proprietary glasgow interface explorer web service that would cache bitstreams for you which is on by default
<whitequark[m]>
"why do you need that if you can build a bitstream locally in just a few seconds" it's for uhhhh frictionless experience. our marketing people say everyone wants it
<whitequark[m]>
it should also go down sometimes randomly and break compilation for everyone, even if you do have the toolchain installed locally
Wanda[cis] has joined #glasgow
<Wanda[cis]>
ah, I see you have finally decided to not be like Sayaka
<whitequark[cis]>
explain?
<Wanda[cis]>
finally an effort to monetize glasgow!
<whitequark[cis]>
oh god.
<whitequark[cis]>
I remember now.
<Wanda[cis]>
the service should also insert ads into the bitstreams. somehow.
<whitequark[cis]>
morse code on LEDs?
<Wanda[cis]>
was likewise thinking about it
<whitequark[cis]>
play them back through <del>coil</del> tantalum cap whine somehow?