dgilmore changed the topic of #fedora-riscv to: Fedora on RISC-V https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RISC-V || Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/fedora-riscv || Alt Arch discussions are welcome in #fedora-alt-arches
davidlt has joined #fedora-riscv
davidlt has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
davidlt has joined #fedora-riscv
jcajka has joined #fedora-riscv
<rwmjones> morning
<BryceII> definitly need a new kernel
<BryceII> auditd[223]: Error - audit support not in kernel
<rwmjones> selinux is the main one I'm missing
<BryceII> I wouldn;t mind so much but I put the unmatched onto a dmz for a collegue to have a poke and play with but in the 20 minutes that it was visable to the wild internet 25 login attempots from varius crytomininng/ddos bots tried to take over
* sorear wonders how many of those have been ported to riscv64 yet
defolos has quit [Quit: Bridge terminating on SIGTERM]
CarlosEDP has quit [Quit: Bridge terminating on SIGTERM]
<BryceII> sorear: not enough...
<davidlt> selinus? that one works
<davidlt> audit is kinda fine, but outdated, but the upstream doesn't want to take audit patches
<sorear> I did not mean kernel features :)
<BryceII> davidlt: ah I didn;t mean your kernel,.. the siufive provided one is somewhat...sparten 8)
<BryceII> sifive
<davidlt> ah you mean FUSDK?
<BryceII> yes
<davidlt> That's not intended to be a full distro like Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, etc.
<davidlt> It's more of a demo (that's in the name actually)
<davidlt> Distributions are extremely complicated and a lot of things were tuned over a decade or more
<BryceII> I was only using that because it was what came with the kit,.. I did try moving over to the fc33 5.10.6-200 but that bailed out after crng for whatever reason,.. I assumed it wasn;t able to handle the ttySIFO
<davidlt> the patches to fully support Unmatched are not yet upstreamed
<davidlt> it's in a good enough shape, but few minor things are missing
<davidlt> kernel wise most landed in 5.13
<davidlt> well, almost everything :)
<BryceII> heh <-- dealing with unicam for RPi kernel @work
* BryceII hates dealing with the dts files
<davidlt> hmm..
<davidlt> Alibaba is trying to upstream custom instructions for their SoC
<davidlt> {"xtheadc", &gcc_options::x_riscv_x_subext, MASK_XTHEAD_C},
<davidlt> this might require popcorn
<BryceII> (chuckle)
<BryceII> well another concern I have at work is that they're looking gazebo to use the client to talk to the factory floor robots so I gotta deal with that however RHEL dropped gcc-objc which a lot of the dependancies require,.. so I'm having to rebuild gcc to build up gcc-objc. RHT made a big yell about not supporting objc but it;s there in fc everywhere and all the other distro's are still carrying it 8/ it's only the RHEL that doesn;t provide it and g
* BryceII shakes a fist at Jeff Law
<davidlt> They actually did upstream "thead-c906" tuning a week ago
<sorear> ah, gcc-patches
<BryceII> http://linuxgizmos.com/risc-v-based-allwinner-chip-to-debut-on-13-linux-hacker-board/ the article there claims the C906 board will offer H264/H.265 video encoding
<BryceII> for $13 8)
* BryceII eyes the unmatched's $670 price tag please tell me that was mainly the memory cost,.. -cry-
<sorear> that's very unlikely to touch riscv arch code, media codecs are IO devices
<sorear> it's the "we only made 200 of them and we need to set the price high enough that they don't disappear in 5 minutes" price
<BryceII> reminds me I must get the freaking receipt from croudsupply and expense it
<rwmjones> davidlt: re 5.13, should it boot with upstream only? also do you have a handy link to the non-upstream patches?
* BryceII beats his head against the wall,.. why does fedora do this crap,...
<BryceII> rubygem-multi_xml in the src specfile it has BuildRequires: rubygem(rexml) yet rubygem(rexml) isn;t provided by anything I can find
<BryceII> how the hell was it every built in the koji buildsystem?!
<BryceII> wait there it is,..
<BryceII> now why isn;t that in the koji database
* BryceII eyes the state of the ruby universe/specfiles and dispairs
<BryceII> dnf list rubygem-rexml --showduplicates ... seems it was only a recent addition,.. -fek- but even so the spec files look odd on tha the src.rpm provides the binary?
<BryceII> on tha/in that
<BryceII> error: %changelog not in descending chronological order ... did fedora packaging standards start slipping recently?
* BryceII pulls ogre apart
<rwmjones> BryceII: that warning was added a few years ago, but nothing enforces it so people still make mistakes
<BryceII> rwmjones: it's a bit of a nightmare getting this request built,.. (gazebo for controlling robots on the factory floor for rhel8)
<BryceII> has overtones of when I ported RHEL to alpha,.. to sparc64, to arm64, to mips64,..
<BryceII> I hate my life 8)
bkeys has joined #fedora-riscv
davidlt has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
jcajka has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<BryceII> insane,.. you pull in a 38Mb package to get one macro definition, %{_emacs_version} ffs split it out!
<BryceII> why for the love of green apples is Cyton using macros from rust?!? %global upver %{version_no_tilde %{nil}}
<BryceII> version_no_tilde is defined in rust-srpm-macros
bkeys has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bkeys has joined #fedora-riscv
bkeys has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
defolos has joined #fedora-riscv
CarlosEDP has joined #fedora-riscv
Eighth_Doctor has joined #fedora-riscv
defolos has quit [Quit: node-irc says goodbye]
Eighth_Doctor has quit [Quit: node-irc says goodbye]
CarlosEDP has quit [Quit: node-irc says goodbye]
defolos has joined #fedora-riscv
CarlosEDP has joined #fedora-riscv
Eighth_Doctor has joined #fedora-riscv
bkeys has joined #fedora-riscv
masami has joined #fedora-riscv