dgilmore changed the topic of #fedora-riscv to: Fedora on RISC-V https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RISC-V || Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/fedora-riscv || Alt Arch discussions are welcome in #fedora-alt-arches
bkircher has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1]
<BryceII> Theyt are not kidding when they say the spi_mmc is slow,.. I did a test last nigh having just fitted the board into an itx case dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 | buffer -S1024K -p75 > /dev/nvme0n1 (I'd to find and compile up the buffer srcs) as the default sifive SD card doesn't have it) so it starts out at around 80M/s but rapidly starts to loose speed which I assume for now is some sort of buffer starvation on the mmc side .. it eventually after *6 hou
<BryceII> finally dropped to a weak 1633K/s
<BryceII> now is that weak HW or the driver.. I'm half enclined to go dive in the kernel and find teh datasheets to the IO chip
<BryceII> wel,.. I'm dragging down the last fedora developer image to give that a go and see if that differs as a comparisone
<BryceII> gonna be a long weekend
masami has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
<BryceII> hurm,. ok well I tried generating a fedora SD image using virt-builder but I'm getting garbage out of the serial port. @115200 and @9600 I've tries some of the otehr speeds and I'm not hitting anything usable.
<BryceII> (this is booting on a sifive unleasehed board)
masami has joined #fedora-riscv
<BryceII> does anyone know what thge MSEL dip switchs actually control on the unmatched board? being told 'set MSEL xyz' is all well and good but I'd like to know whatI'm switching on and off
<BryceII> ah never min it's on page 11 of the getting started guide bit I was thrown by the silk screen saying what was the on/off direction
davidlt has joined #fedora-riscv
davidlt has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<rwmjones> oh wait, we don't have rust on fedora/risc-v ..?
<rwmjones> davidlt: do you understand why this build failed? http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1210704 is it because we don't have rust on risc-v? the build system for this package is .. weir
<rwmjones> davidlt: do you understand why this build failed? http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1210704 is it because we don't have rust on risc-v? the build system for this package is .. weird
<BryceII> DEBUG util.py:598: Package rust-packaging-16-1.fc33.riscv64 is already installed.
<BryceII> DEBUG util.py:596: Error:
<BryceII> DEBUG util.py:596: Problem: nothing provides requested (crate(indicatif/default) >= 0.15.0 with crate(indicatif/default) < 0.16.0)
<BryceII> DEBUG util.py:598: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
* BryceII pokes
<BryceII> indicatif is what needs built I would expect
<BryceII> <-- will be very upset if this is part of the google plan to pollute the kernel with rust
<BryceII> ok,... I now have fedora risc-v going
<BryceII> much mangling 8/
iooi has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
iooi has joined #fedora-riscv