00:01 <DavidHeidelberg> digetx if you or someone want, there is (not adapted to tegra, it's for Nexus 2013 - qcom) script for directly picking up tar from github and fastbooting the kernel (and also it ignores modules for now): https://gitlab.com/okias/kernel-simpleci/-/blob/main/upload_kernel.sh

00:01 <DavidHeidelberg> but I plan to make it more generic :)

00:03 <DavidHeidelberg> falling asleep, good night digetx & all :)

00:04 <digetx> gn, thank you

00:12 <jenneron[m]> it would be nice to run CI checks on non-master branch, e.g. if someone opens a PR he can see what is wrong while checking lint and fix some issues even without review from digetx

00:12 <jenneron[m]> i don't insist, decision is yours of course

00:19 <DavidHeidelberg> jenneron also checkpatch would be nice on PR's, I was also thinking about it :P

00:20 <DavidHeidelberg> since not everyone has it in pre-commit hook

00:20 <digetx> good ideas

00:21 <DavidHeidelberg> I will probably look at it at sunday (tomorrow I'm off)

00:23 <digetx> it also should be possible to boot-test it with qemu

00:23 <digetx> I may even resume the work on qemu and add t30+ support

00:24 <DavidHeidelberg> jenneron if you (or anyone else) will have some code or ideas, feel free to drop them at https://gitlab.com/okias/kernel-simpleci I'll try to cover as much arm/arm64 kernels for phones/tablets with it as possible

00:25 <DavidHeidelberg> yml will be probably always customized, but it should hold as some solid template for new forks or mainlining efforts

00:29 <jenneron[m]> well, speaking of modules, it may be reasonable to package kernel, e.g. after that you can use wget and `dpkg -i` or `apk add`, i usually update modules in pmOS this way

00:30 <jenneron[m]> that may be not the best solution though

00:35 <jenneron[m]> digetx: btw, just wondering, any specific reason why we use full node hierarchy in DTs instead of label references which are used in almost all new upstream DTs?

00:36 <jenneron[m]> i do that just to be consistent with other tegra DTs, but why they use that too i don't know

00:40 <digetx> no specific reason

00:41 <digetx> label would protect from a typo, but not sure how often this is a problem

00:45 <digetx> you can make patches for labels if you think that it's useful

00:48 <jenneron[m]> do you mean i can make patches only for my DT or i would have to change it for all DTs which use same SoC? they should be consistent, right?

00:50 <digetx> yes, you should do it for all

00:51 <jenneron[m]> well, maybe i will do it if that's not a problem for you and contributors to work with updated DTs

00:53 <digetx> I may include these patches into my 'device-tree improvements' series for upstream if you'll do it soon

00:55 <digetx> today/tomorrow

00:58 <jenneron[m]> i hope you mean all T30 DTs, but not all tegra*

01:03 <jenneron[m]> will i be suprised?

01:17 <digetx> you should add labels to all tegra dtsi files, changing individual board DT files should be optional

01:18 <jenneron[m]> ok