09:01 <jenneron[m]> maybe offtopic, but is there a benchmark which can test OpenGL 1.4?

15:22 <DavidHeidelberg> jenneron do u need benchmarking capatibility or just some demos?

15:50 <jenneron[m]> demos only

15:50 <jenneron[m]> I want to package it for pmaports

15:50 <jenneron[m]> so I would need to test

15:56 <DavidHeidelberg> jenneron check https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/demos/tree/ it'll have for sure some older GL stuff (e.g. glxgears etc.)

15:57 <DavidHeidelberg> and/or alpine pkg "mesa-demos"

15:58 <DavidHeidelberg> for other testing there is https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/piglit

15:59 <DavidHeidelberg> jenneron are we at OGL 1.4 with host1x?! :)

15:59 <jenneron[m]> well, it would be ok if it won't use llvmpipe instead of GL 1.4 or if it can be configured

15:59 <jenneron[m]> doesn't*

16:00 <DavidHeidelberg> jenneron glxinfo # if it shows grate driver, then all demos should go with the driver

16:00 <jenneron[m]> David Heidelberg: I don't really understand your question about GL 1.4 and host1x

16:01 <DavidHeidelberg> nevermind :)

16:01 <jenneron[m]> ok, thanks

20:06 <jenneron[m]> digetx: btw i didn't really understand what is wrong with label at gpio-keys node, we have some DTs in upstream with such labels

20:06 <jenneron[m]> do they pass lint check?

20:06 <jenneron[m]> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-longcheer-l8910.dts#L28

20:07 <jenneron[m]> i can show how this label makes difference in userspace

20:07 <jenneron[m]> although it doesn't really matter, just cosmetic thing

20:09 <digetx> maybe it's not wrong, please make PR to add it back if it's correct

20:13 <digetx> the binding schema specifies pattern that matches everything, perhaps it should be correct then, I haven't seen such labels before