<digetx>
jenneron[m]: if lp2 cpuidle doesn't work for efi, shouldn't we disable it in the device-tree? either remove nvidia,suspend-mode or set it to <3>
<jenneron[m]>
ok, I will look at it
<digetx>
jenneron[m]: you probably will also need to set entry point to __tegra_cpu_reset_handler in acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot()
<digetx>
although, maybe no
<digetx>
__tegra_cpu_reset_handler won't work without additional changes, but it should work as-is using the secondary_startup()
<digetx>
maybe that acpi parking needs to be wrapped into firmware_ops if entry point is entry point needs to be set before each suspend
<jenneron[m]>
maybe leanderglanda can look at it
<digetx>
you should check first whether cpuidle works with a disabled lp2, it already could be enough that the reset vector is initialized at a boot time
<leanderglanda[m]>
I'm currently debugging what's wrong with ACPI Parking Protocol. Right now it fails in `acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot`. (`mailbox = ioremap(cpu_entry->mailbox_addr, sizeof(*mailbox));` returns null)
<leanderglanda[m]>
But to be honest I don't really get why it fails. Nothing should have changed 🤷♂️
<digetx>
you should need to reserve that mailbox memory using reserved-memory in device-tree
<leanderglanda[m]>
Kernel gets the memory map from UEFI, and that memory map already contains these addresses as reserved.
<leanderglanda[m]>
I'm trying a normal linux-next kernel now, applied the patch and now I'll see if that boots. Just in case grate-linux makes the issue.
<digetx>
there was a warning previously from that ioremap in your log, maybe it's less permissive now
<leanderglanda[m]>
grate-linux is not the issue.
<leanderglanda[m]>
ACPI Parking Protocol is really broken in the latest kernel versions.
<digetx>
you should find the place in the code that rejects ioremap
<leanderglanda[m]>
<leanderglanda[m] "mtype is `MT_DEVICE`"> If I remember correctly pfn should be 82002/3/4 (debugged yesterday)
hexdump0815 has joined #tegra
<digetx>
DavidHeidelberg: do you mean to read upstream pstore from older downstream kernel?
<DavidHeidelberg>
digetx boot latest kernel with pstore; read pstore from ramconsole on downstream 3.4
<hexdump0815>
does anyone here know if suspend ever worked properly on nyan big (acer cb5 311 chromebook with tegra k1) on mainline?
<hexdump0815>
i did some debugging with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG and it looks like all the stages from /sys/power/pm_test are running fine
<hexdump0815>
looks like somehow the system does not enter the low level suspend state properly in the end
<hexdump0815>
similar question regarding the soc-therm driver - does anyone know if it was every properly working on mainline for this device?
<digetx>
leanderglanda[m]: I remember having a similar problem with the simple-framebuffer, the ioremap was failing the same way in older kernel versions, but it got fixed in the newer kernels, maybe you should take a look what API uses simple-framebuffer for memory mapping
<hexdump0815>
tagr: cyndis: maybe any idea regarding the above?
<leanderglanda[m]>
digetx: OK, thank you.
<digetx>
DavidHeidelberg: ramconsole and pstore are not compatible, you can't read pstore from ramconsole; you can enable the ramconsole on newer kernel using my patch and then read it from 3.4
<digetx>
grate-kernel has ramconsole too, that gist patch should be outdated now for the more recent kernels
<DavidHeidelberg>
digetx thank you
<digetx>
hexdump0815: it's likely that soctherm was tested only on tk1
<digetx>
the easiest solution could be to enable software thermal throttling
<digetx>
nyan has lm90 which should be connected to cpu/soc
<digetx>
lm-sensors should see it
<digetx>
and temperature should be high when cpu is hot
<digetx>
it also should be possible to use soctherm for sw throttling
<leanderglanda[m]>
digetx: A small little progress update: CrackTheSurface got the TCover to work for the first time 🥳.
<leanderglanda[m]>
Probably not ready for grate-linux yet, some details need to be worked out.
<digetx>
what is TCover
<leanderglanda[m]>
the keyboard you can plug into the surface RT. Until now a USB keyboard was necessary.
<leanderglanda[m]>
digetx: Right now hotplug doesn't work. Would need a kernel module.
<leanderglanda[m]>
i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict needs to be modified. Right now a simple `if (addr == 0x00) return 0;` does the job. But I guess this fix should only exist if you build for surfaceRT.
<m4t>
[ 1.088622] tps65910 1-002d: failed to register tps65910-pmic regulator
<m4t>
checking syslog for the first instance of it
<m4t>
seems to have started when i upgraded to 5.13.0-rc6-next-20210618
<m4t>
but i do not update that frequently, so it may have started earlier
<m4t>
i don't see recent commits to tps65910.c or tps65910-pmic.c
gouchi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<digetx>
I know what's the problem, it's harmless, will add patch to silence the error message
<m4t>
5.13.0-rc2-next-20210520 was OK, 5.13.0-rc6-next-20210618, 5.13.0-rc7-next-20210625, and 5.13.0-next-20210701 show the failure
<m4t>
k
<hexdump0815>
digetx: it looks like your thermal patch is doing what it is supposed to:) - thanks a lot
<hexdump0815>
digetx: how is the soctherm state (if it exists there) for the older tegra socs - is it working well there? iirc it did not work properly too there and you at some places also did regular opp throttling - right?
<hexdump0815>
digetx: on nyan big i'm getting this on startup: https://pastebin.com/raw/JXgNdyfr and i'm not sure where it gets those wrong values from - looks a bit like wrong data type
<digetx>
soctherm driver supports only T124/210
<digetx>
the values are okay, they mean that thermal core disabled the low temperature threshold
<digetx>
that info message is misleading, it should be a debug message, I'll add patch to silence it
<hexdump0815>
digetx: thanks a lot, that might be good idea ... regarding those strange values: shouldn
<hexdump0815>
digetx: shouldn't it read the trip temps etc. from the dtb and display them there instead?
<hexdump0815>
digetx: oh - it looks like it actually reads the trips
<hexdump0815>
digetx: is 60c the max temp the tegra124 should run at? looks a bit low to me ... but iirc it was somehow auto-shutdown when it got slightly higher - which somehow does not really fit the high trip points in the dtb
<digetx>
it's not the max temp, you can set it to a higher value; passive trip won't cause the shutdown
<digetx>
we should probably use the lm90 for the skin temperature