11:21 <bvernoux> @electronic_eel, azonenberg I'm contacted by Lecroy too in France

11:21 <bvernoux> So far I do not want to buy Lecroy because they are less better than alternative software especially towards noise floor or advanced features like upgrade by software (without requiring to ship the scope to change HW to upgrade BW...)

11:22 <bvernoux> -software

11:22 <bvernoux> I compare them to Tek MSO64B even if Tek are less better towards SCPI speed so far

11:22 <bvernoux> I do not compare anything to KeySight as I do not like their politic and their prices are totally crazy too

11:23 <bvernoux> for other scope like Rigol they are too far in comparison and they cannot be used for validation

11:24 <bvernoux> Especially they have no any service for calibration ...

11:24 <bvernoux> Rigol are also too slow when used over SCPI

11:24 <azonenberg> lain: speaking of which, how far are you from ready to merge the queue manager stuff?

14:15 <_whitenotifier-7> [scopehal] azonenberg opened issue #714: Unwrapped phase angle filter - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/issues/714

14:15 <_whitenotifier-7> [scopehal] azonenberg labeled issue #714: Unwrapped phase angle filter - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/issues/714

14:17 <_whitenotifier-7> [scopehal] azonenberg labeled issue #715: Deviation from linear phase filter - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/issues/715

14:17 <_whitenotifier-7> [scopehal] azonenberg opened issue #715: Deviation from linear phase filter - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/issues/715