01:31 < jeffin143> rcurtin : lozhnikov is awesome , the amount of knowledge he showcased me , he made me look silly at many isntance

01:31 < jeffin143> I learnt a ton from him :)

01:33 < jeffin143> Thanks lozhnikov for everything :)

01:43 < jeffin143> lozhnikov , while testing the bindings i found out that of text has , in it's Corpus and it is stored in .CSV file then our code will not work since i read the contents of CSV using , and it couldn't distinguish between a CSV comma and text comma*

01:43 < jeffin143> If*

01:43 < jeffin143> If text has `comma`(,)

07:34 < jenkins-mlpack2> Project docker mlpack nightly build build #430: STILL FAILING in 3 hr 20 min: http://ci.mlpack.org/job/docker%20mlpack%20nightly%20build/430/

08:54 < lozhnikov> rcurtin, jeffin143: Thanks!:)

08:57 < lozhnikov> jeffin143: Yes, I see. I think we should look through some real text datasets. Probably the text has quotation marks at the beginning and at the end.

09:13 < zoq> I couldn't agree more, great job @lozhnikov and @jeffin143.

11:21 < bharat> Hello there!!

11:21 < zoq> bharat: Hello

11:23 < bharat> I am very much excited to contribute in mlpack org.....i want to work on implementation of deep learning models....But i had done all ml part in python....as i can see that you guys use cpp for your work...i have started learning cpp for that....could you please suggest me how to proceed further??

11:28 < zoq> bharat: I guess the next reasonable step would be to get familiar with the mlpack codebase. Go through some tutorials run some tests, since you are interested in the network implementation: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/blob/master/src/mlpack/tests/feedforward_network_test.cpp would be interesting, there are more network related tests in https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/blob/master/src/mlpack/tests/.

11:28 < zoq> bharat: Maybe there is an interesting layer/network you like to work on, I think fixing an issue, extending an exsisting method or implementing someting that is missing is also a great entry point.

11:29 < bharat> okay...zoq...thanks a lot

14:39 < lozhnikov> jeffin143: I've read your summary. I think it's better to mention #1814 rather than #1960. Besides, there are a few style issues. I suggest you to read the whole text a couple of times.