ChanServ changed the topic of #mlpack to: "mlpack: a fast, flexible machine learning library :: We don't always respond instantly, but we will respond; please be patient :: Logs at http://www.mlpack.org/irc/
govg has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
govg has joined #mlpack
< rcurtin> Toshal: sorry for the slow response, sent you a PM
< rcurtin> oh wait, not online, oops
vivekp has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
vivekp has joined #mlpack
< jenkins-mlpack2> Project docker mlpack nightly build build #336: STILL UNSTABLE in 3 hr 34 min: http://ci.mlpack.org/job/docker%20mlpack%20nightly%20build/336/
vpal has joined #mlpack
vivekp has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
vpal is now known as vivekp
ShikharJ_ has joined #mlpack
< ShikharJ_> rcurtin: zoq: Hmm, I was wondering if not for ML/AI, which area within CS would've been your preferred area of specialization?
ShikharJ_ has quit [Client Quit]
xiaohong has joined #mlpack
vivekp has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
vivekp has joined #mlpack
Toshal has joined #mlpack
Toshal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
< rcurtin> ShikharJ_: my original interests were in speech processing and speech synthesis; but when I got to grad school, those fields were being quickly supplanted by more pure machine leadning techniques so I ended up doing machine learning :)
< jenkins-mlpack2> Project mlpack - git commit test build #177: UNSTABLE in 47 min: http://ci.mlpack.org/job/mlpack%20-%20git%20commit%20test/177/
jeffin143 has joined #mlpack
pd09041999 has joined #mlpack
pd09041999 has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
pd09041999 has joined #mlpack
pd09041999 has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
mulx10 has joined #mlpack
< mulx10> Is this method acceptable for image loading : https://pastebin.com/yP3bUe70?
< mulx10> it uses header only library (https://github.com/nothings/stb/blob/master/stb_image.h).
< mulx10> rcurtin, zoq: Please let me know.
< mulx10> Thanks
mulx10 has quit [Client Quit]
< zoq> mulx10: Is it compatible with the 3-Clause BSD license?
akhandait has joined #mlpack
akhandait has quit [Client Quit]
< rcurtin> mulx10: that's ok with me but let's avoid including stb directly in our project (perhaps CMake should simply download it if it is not available)
govg has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
MLJens has joined #mlpack
< MLJens> Hi. Can anybody tell me, which lib is containing the arma::mat<double> refernce? Just started with MLPack and got a linker error compiling my project.
govg has joined #mlpack
< rcurtin> ShikharJ_: my original interests were in speech processing and speech synthesis; but when I got to grad school, those fields were being quickly supplanted by more pure machine leadning techniques so I ended up doing machine learning :)
< rcurtin> oops, didn't mean to send that message twice, sorry
< rcurtin> MLJens: maybe you need -larmadillo?
< rcurtin> or -lmlpack
vivekp has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
< MLJens> still referenced mlpack.lib and armadillo.lib
< rcurtin> MLJens: hmm, can you provide the error in more detail/
< rcurtin> *?
Toshal has joined #mlpack
< MLJens> ErrorLNK2001unresolved external symbol "class arma::Mat<double> data" (?data@@3V?$Mat@N@arma@@A)
< MLJens> I still know those errors, but I don't know, which file to reference in this case.
< rcurtin> does it give any more information than that? like which file defines the 'data' matrix
< rcurtin> and is it possible that you've defined some matrix 'data' as 'extern' somewhere perhaps?
< MLJens> Yes, external arma::mat data;
< MLJens> No, the file containing the reference is, what I need to know to link it :)
< rcurtin> ok, but if you have 'extern arma::mat data' somewhere, you also need to define that
< rcurtin> are you using one of the example programs in the documentation?
< rcurtin> the idea there is just that there exists some matrix you are running on, so you should replace the 'extern arma::mat data' with whatever is needed to load the data you want to use
< MLJens> Thank you, that is it. I still wondered. Usually, I use external to write an function for a Dll :)
< MLJens> Yes, trying the examples to get used to mlpack.
< MLJens> really looks nice...
< MLJens> Thank you for your help. Now, I have to make a break as the football final starts soon :)
vivekp has joined #mlpack
< rcurtin> MLJens: sounds good, enjoy the game :)
< Toshal> rcurtin: Sorry, at first I didn't get that a PM in your message meant PM on Irc. So here I am.
< MLJens> Half of the match is still played. Remembered the wrong time of kickoff :(
ShikharJ_ has joined #mlpack
< ShikharJ_> rcurtin: Interesting! And what about you zoq? Do you have an alternative field, that you were deeply interested at the time?
< zoq> ShikharJ_: Completed some really interesting physics courses. Would love to dive in more :)
< ShikharJ_> zoq: Quantum? Or Classical?
< zoq> classical
< ShikharJ_> Nice
< ShikharJ_> zoq: I'll be mostly finished with running the tests for https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/1823 by tomorrow, and I wish to merge it at the earliest. I'd love your input on that whenever you're free.
sreenik has joined #mlpack
< ShikharJ_> Toshal: I have merged in the OReilly GAN fix PR, since I felt it was complete. After that, I'll merge in the Memory Sharing between GAN and FFN PR. Do you have a preference of me reviewing the dual optimizer PR first? Or can I focus on getting the Serialization PR merged (I personally feel that's more important)?
saksham189 has joined #mlpack
< rcurtin> ShikharJ_: if you're moving fast with the PRs, I can wait to release 3.1.1 until you have the serialization PR merged (I'm hoping to wait no later than tomorrow)
saksham189_ has joined #mlpack
< rcurtin> the other two (memory sharing and dual optimizer) can wait until 3.2.0 since that would be adding functionality
< Toshal> ShikharJ: Okay I am fine with merging serialization first. It's upto you. But, I guess Dual Optimizer PR may change quite a lot of code. But I am fine with it.
< ShikharJ_> rcurtin: Let's wait on the GANs, I'd rather release them when we have the full functionality. We solved two issues with the convergence and memory usage, and two issues pertaining to (serialization and optimizer) need to be worked upon a bit. When are you planning on releasing 3.2.0?
< ShikharJ_> Toshal: Okay, then let's work on Serialization first, since it is a more pressing concern. Dual optimizer requires an API change, but isn't super-essential in the absolute sense. I'll merge the memory sharing work in the morning tomorrow, and maybe then you can continue with the serialization work.
< rcurtin> ShikharJ_: I had no particular date for 3.2.0, just whenever some more stuff is ready for release :)
< rcurtin> and ok, I won't wait for the GAN PRs, whenever the RF test fix is merge I'll release 3.1.1
< rcurtin> thanks for the info :)
< ShikharJ_> Cool, other than what I have mentioned above, I think the work is pretty complete and self contained. Maybe a 3.1.2 can happen (I think none of the GAN related work has made into any release).
< ShikharJ_> With 3.2.0, we can add a lot more functionality and evaluation metric support, and different variations of GANs.
< rcurtin> yeah; basically if there is a patch or tiny change, 3.1.2 can be the release number, if we add anything new then it can be 3.2.0
< ShikharJ_> rcurtin: Where can I find the release notes of previous releases?
saksham189 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
< rcurtin> HISTORY.md should contain them all
< ShikharJ_> Okay, great.
< Toshal> ShikharJ: Okay. I will merge conflicts tommorow.
< ShikharJ_> saksham189_: Are you there?
< saksham189_> ShikharJ_: yes
< ShikharJ_> I assume you have seen the previous conversation?
< saksham189_> yes, I will work on adding minibatch discrimination layer
< ShikharJ_> Okay great. Try to formulate an idea of how it is going to be implemented, and we will discuss on Monday.
< ShikharJ_> 9.30 pm
< ShikharJ_> And what about your work on Highway networks? Do you feel that's ready for review?
< saksham189_> yes, I am waiting for a review on that.
< ShikharJ_> saksham189_: Cool, I'll take a look on that tomorrow as well. For the first phase, we'll focus purely on increasing GAN toolkit and making the existing framework more robust.
< ShikharJ_> And GAN varients will follow after that.
< ShikharJ_> *variants
< ShikharJ_> saksham189_: Did you happen to travel already? Let me know if you need some time off for doing that.
< saksham189_> ShikharJ_: thanks for the follow-up. sounds good to me.
< saksham189_> yes I got tired after travelling and couldn’t attend the meet.
< ShikharJ_> Ah, I see. Currently in Vietnam?
< saksham189_> yes
< ShikharJ_> Okay good, have a nice time. I'll be off for now. See you on Monday then.
< saksham189_> alright, see you then. :)
< ShikharJ_> rcurtin: Hmm, I can confirm GANs are not a part of the releases, so let's try to get them for 3.2.0.
< rcurtin> ShikharJ_: sounds good
< rcurtin> I had forgotten I pulled them out, I guess
ShikharJ_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
saksham189_ is now known as sakshamB
govg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
govg has joined #mlpack
Toshal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
sreenik has quit [Quit: Page closed]
jeffin143 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jeffin143 has joined #mlpack
jeffin143 has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
jeffin143 has joined #mlpack
MLJens has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
jeffin143 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
xiaohong has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]