01:03 <digetx> tagr: there is no https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20211211211412.10791-27-digetx@gmail.com/ in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git/log/?h=for-5.17/arm/dt

01:04 <digetx> I asked you to rebase your patches multiple times and I'm not happy if you lost that patch because you decided that it's unimportant

01:07 <digetx> unimportant to do the rebase

01:48 <lindylex> encountering issues compiling Nvidia driver: https://termbin.com/xyi1

02:04 <digetx> downgrade kernel to older version supported by the nv blob driver or wait until newer version of the blob will be out

02:14 <digetx> tagr: why you dropped the DT labels? I don't care about them, but this will make other people unhappy

02:25 <lindylex> I found a solution by using this patch : https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2020/inttf-nvidia-patcher/comment-page-4/?unapproved=416348&moderation-hash=d4feeccd975c3331cac906cdf7403592#comment-416348

02:30 <digetx> DavidHeidelberg: I noticed that we have undocumented nvidia,dmic-clk-en-gpios in the audio binding, not sure why it's uncaught by the dt_binding_check, but that needs to be fixed

02:45 <digetx> nvidia,hp-en and nvidia,mic-presen also not documented

02:47 <digetx> that should be because unevaluatedProperties doesn't work

08:00 <tagr> digetx: I didn't loose the patch, I just haven't gotten around to it yet

14:19 <tagr> digetx: regarding the labels, I already replied to one of your patches that I wanted them removed, and if anyone's unhappy about my decision they should feel free to speak up

14:54 <digetx> do you mean that you won't accept labels at all?

18:05 <tagr> digetx: like I said in my email, I'll accept labels that are actually used, but please don't add them just for the sake of it

18:06 <tagr> digetx: one thing that I don't want to see is these weird label references where all of a sudden pinmux data or EMC tables appear at the very end of the file, just put them where they belong in the tree

18:08 <tagr> digetx: please also check the latest for-next, it should have pretty much everything now, except this one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20211130232347.950-34-digetx@gmail.com/

18:08 <tagr> for the reasons I mentioned by email

18:29 <digetx> tagr: do you have plans to move tegra drm kernel tree out from the cgit.freedesktop.org? it's barely working

18:34 <digetx> can't fetch from anongit.freedesktop.org

18:37 <digetx> labels help with readability a lot for those who rarely touch DTs

18:59 <digetx> the korg's for-next looks good, you could've kept the sdmmc labels of the t30+ transformer's DTs because we have those labels in other DTs, but we can re-add them next time :)

19:00 <digetx> I'll check drm once fdo will awake, or please push it somewhere else

19:01 <digetx> ah, wait

19:01 <digetx> I see it on your gitlab

19:05 <digetx> drm is also good

19:06 <digetx> well done, thank you

19:08 <digetx> I only don't see the DPAUX patches, they are very needed for Nyan

19:08 <digetx> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=274528

20:40 <tagr> there's a mirror on gitlab.freedesktop.org

20:41 <tagr> ah... you've found that

20:42 <tagr> I'm still looking into that DPAUX thing because I don't think the revert is the best solution

20:54 <digetx> revert? there is no revert in the v2

20:59 <digetx> there is a global variable there that I don't like, but it's good enough to fix the trouble and backport the fix, we can improve it later on

21:00 <digetx> well, not global, but static

21:03 <digetx> although, you probably mean the revert of registration order, but we can't change it easily, too much trouble