beneroth changed the topic of #picolisp to: PicoLisp language | The scalpel of software development | Channel Log: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/picolisp | Check www.picolisp.com for more information
seninha has quit [Quit: Leaving]
rob_w has joined #picolisp
seninha has joined #picolisp
<abu[7]> taleon: Yes, and it is beautiful
<bjorkintosh> somehow, it seems the lisp adventurers always miss Picolisp. how's that possible?
<abu[7]> No idea. Perhaps because it is too different?
<bjorkintosh> it has ()s!!!
<bjorkintosh> in the beginning was the atom and the (). and /\ saw it was good. and then /\ from the atom and the () created forms.
<abu[7]> But as Colin writes in your link, you stop seeing the parentheses
<abu[7]> T
<bjorkintosh> some were deemed special, and some were deemed regular. but thus arose a language.
<fbytez> Unfortunately, I can't quite remember how I discovered pil. All I remember is that I was researching languages that have a relatively simple implementation.
<fbytez> Something I haven't seen in another lisp, so far, is having the full dynamic scoping instead of lexical.
<bjorkintosh> there are numerical designations for those.
<abu[7]> Lisp1 vs. Lisp2?
<fbytez> I haven't really written much lisp, but I not only find that the "()" somewhat disappear, I also like them; there's never any ambiguity.
<fbytez> I like postfix for similar reasons.
<abu[7]> Me too. But as you said, the other issue is dynamic binding
<fbytez> I actually think Haskell would have been better to not include infix notation.
<bjorkintosh> Haskell's pedigree requires it to have that syntax.
<bjorkintosh> PJ Landin's papers were the origin, if I'm not mistaken.
<bjorkintosh> that is why a number of FPs have a particular syntatic similarity. Hope, Miranda, the MLs, Haskell, Idris, etc.
<bjorkintosh> Clean ...
rob_w has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
casaca has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
<bjorkintosh> to be sure, I like the ()s.
<bjorkintosh> I like to see them.
pablo_escoberg has joined #picolisp
<pablo_escoberg> I was also disappointed that that article omitted picolisp.  Personally, I found it on Hacker News.  It would come up once in a while, I'd look into and be impressed, then move on.  Finally, the pure elegance of the thing got to me and I started coding again.  Very glad I did.
pablo_escoberg has quit [Quit: Client closed]
seninha has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
seninha has joined #picolisp
<fbytez> It gets a small mention in the HN comments.
seninha has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]