<Church->
InPhase: eh? it's simple as "i don't want to yellow underside of attachable part to flip around" even if offset is changed :)
<Church->
and for that it seems that extra rotation is needed, which i can so far only enter manually, not getting by what formula it should be auto-calculated :(
guerd87 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
guerd871 has joined #openscad
feuerrot_ is now known as feuerrot
jonasbits has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jonasbits has joined #openscad
ur5us has joined #openscad
little_blossom has quit [Quit: little_blossom]
ur5us has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
teepee_ has joined #openscad
teepee has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
teepee_ is now known as teepee
mmu_man has joined #openscad
teepee_ has joined #openscad
teepee has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
teepee_ is now known as teepee
<InPhase>
Church-: So the offset problem is fixed by adding this between the rotate and the children: rotate([0,0,-90+90*sign((p2-p1).x)])
<lf94>
1mm nozzle is amazing
<lf94>
0.1mm layer heights with 1mm nozzle saves so much time and it still looks really good
<InPhase>
Church-: But for the combinations of things like crcXoff and linerotAngle, you are using a completely incorrect approach and probably need to start over on how you construct the orientation of this part. You want to do the rotations stepwise in a manner that preserves the orientation you want, and keeping the rotational axis that provides this for as long as you need it. I cannot write it because I
<InPhase>
have not been able to understand the full specification for what flexibility in arranging these pieces you actually want in the end. It cannot be designed without knowing this, because there is not "one true answer" to this, but there are right answers for the rotation possible given certain constraints about what will be adjusted and how.
<InPhase>
Church-: But "stepwise" on the rotations I mean not one big rotate command, but do rotate around each axis one at a time and carefully reason out the order of these, and use translates to center your rotational axis where you need it before rotating.
<J23k3>
lf94 how is stringing Ü .. i thought about making a nozzle with 7× ∅ 0.2 holes to keep this low at least with PETg you will get terrible stringing with big nozzles (or you need a needle valve)
<lf94>
J23k3: zero stringing
guso78 has joined #openscad
<lf94>
Im super impressed
<lf94>
Maybe it's my slower print speed and the retraction testing I did
<J23k3>
PLA?
<guso78>
you guys create your nozzles yourself ?
<J23k3>
only if you want something that is not available .. was testing a glas nozzle once
<guso78[m]>
i think the problem of the glasnozzle is that it cannot conduct heat so well
<J23k3>
yes but you can use radiation to heat the filament
<J23k3>
and have a great heatbreak
<guso78[m]>
are glass nozzles available for buy ?
<J23k3>
not that i am aware of
<InPhase>
Seems hazardous at the slightest printer positioning malfunction.
<J23k3>
ceramic nozzles are in some doodle pens
<J23k3>
and there is a induction heating system .. that could be used to heat an internal hot zone
<J23k3>
if you using airbrush nozzles - they also don't like hard contact
<peepsalot>
i think induction heating if done right could be incredibly effective/responsive, as you can dump heat directly into the bulk of the nozzle, as opposed to waiting to conduct across physical thermal interface of heater and nozzle
<peepsalot>
but no idea about currently available options or their effectiveness
<peepsalot>
you could theoretically tune the system to an optimal skin depth for the nozzle, to heat it thoroughly throughout
guso78 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
<peepsalot>
i dreamed about experimenting with my own inductive nozzle design for a while, but don't have nearly the electronics design knowledge to pull off the power circuitry