08:09 < jenkins-mlpack2> Project docker mlpack nightly build build #392: STILL UNSTABLE in 3 hr 55 min: http://ci.mlpack.org/job/docker%20mlpack%20nightly%20build/392/

08:57 < favre49> zoq: rcurtin: I'm writing the bindings for NEAT. I was wondering how specifying a TaskType would work in this context?

09:01 < favre49> I guess this is something like specifying an environment in mlpack's RL framework, but it doesn't have any python bindings itself

12:48 < jeffin143> lozhnikov : sorry about the past week

12:48 < jeffin143> I was down with fever, feeling much better now , I will resume my work*, today onwards

12:50 < jeffin143> rcurtin : also sorry , I found that I missed some of the spaces in description sections of scaler binding , I saw that after PR was merged , I will handle it in any of the open pr

12:50 < jeffin143> rcurtin : also have you ever happened to check webpack..??, I found that library does something related to what we discussed that day about headers *

12:52 < jeffin143> Also any idea how to join ..?? CPP development site, because strangly googling doesn't give me a strong procedure to join. :)

12:52 < jeffin143> CPP development site means ,those who officially devlop c++ libraries

16:20 < favre49> zoq: Also, I'm having difficulty deciding on a test for phased searching. I though I could just apply it to one of our existing tests, but phased searching doesn't seem to work very well on environments where genome bloat isn't really an issue

16:21 < favre49> The cases where it has been used are difficult to find resources for and judging by the descriptions, pretty time-intensive

16:35 < Toshal> ShikharJ: Yes I am fine about attending the meet tommorow.

16:35 < Toshal> On our regular time at 7:00 pm IST.

17:35 < Toshal> rcurtin: zoq: I want to know that, should I change ordering of the parameters in ensmallen/#109 PR? Since you agreed on keeping it at the end. Frankly speaking it would be like changing half of the PR. I won't mind. Just let me know your thoughts regarding the same.

17:46 < jeffin143> lozhnikov : https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/1904#discussion_r305587839

19:50 < ShikharJ> sakshamB: Toshal: Let's catch up on Monday then.

21:00 < ShikharJ> rcurtin: Do NIPS workshops have a lower page limit for their papers?

21:02 < ShikharJ> I'm reading up the proceedings of different NIPS workshops (MLOSS and some Medical Imaging workshops). But some papers don't seem very technical themselves, and wrap up within 4 pages? This is insane, since the usual NIPS papers are super technical and elaborate, and have quite some additional pages for proofs as well.