05:32 <Consolatis> dnkl: what are your thoughts on adding the corresponding terminfo names to the various OSC functions? e.g. "Ms" for clipboard, "tsl" / "fsl" for setting the Title, "Smulx" for curly underlines (when merged) and so on

05:34 <Consolatis> That would make it way easier for application developers to use newer features without resorting to hardcoding escape sequences + match on $TERM shenanigans

05:44 <Consolatis> On a related note: xterm seems to define kxIN and kxOUT (https://invisible-island.net/ncurses/terminfo.ti.html#tic-xterm_focus), those might be pretty useful for feature detection before calling ?1004h

06:03 <Consolatis> also: your enhancements of XTGETTCAP is pretty neat. /me wonders if we'll see a terminfo wrapper around that feature at some point

10:27 <dnkl> Consolatis: do you mean adding the terminfo names to the C function names? Wouldn't it be better to add them to our ctlseq documentation instead?

10:28 <dnkl> Consolatis: interresting (kxIN/kxOUT). They're not part of the regular xterm/xterm-256color definitions. But since they are used in the official terminfo sources, I think we can safely add them to our own temrinfo

10:37 <dnkl> Consolatis: https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/pulls/1178

11:50 <Consolatis> <dnkl> Consolatis: do you mean adding the terminfo names to the C function names?

11:51 <Consolatis> I was mainly thinking about the readme, but ctlseq documentation would be useful as well

12:28 <sterni> dnkl: if we are still on HarfBuzz 5.1, should we wait with fcft 3.1.5?

19:58 <dnkl> sterni: might be best, yeah