12:56 <rwmjones> does anyone know what's going on with the dtb / u-boot here ...

12:56 <rwmjones> https://paste.centos.org/view/9baa10af

12:56 <rwmjones> specifically why doesn't it boot option 1?

12:57 <rwmjones> there is no filed called "qemu-riscv.dtb" anywhere on the entire filesystem

12:57 <rwmjones> & I assumed that qemu provides the dtb itself through memory pointed to by a0(?)

12:58 <rwmjones> so no file should be needed?

12:59 <rwmjones> hmm maybe "Bad Linux RISCV Image magic!" is not referring to the dtb but to the kernel ...

13:01 <rwmjones> yeah that must be it, this doesn't look right ...

13:01 <rwmjones> /boot/vmlinuz-6.2.16-300.0.riscv64.fc38.riscv64: gzip compressed data, max compression, from Unix, original size modulo 2^32 36054016

13:01 <rwmjones> /boot/vmlinuz-6.5.4-300.0.riscv64.fc39.riscv64: PE32+ executable (EFI application) RISC-V 64-bit (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows, 2 sections

13:01 <rwmjones> ^^ davidlt: is the kernel being built correctly in Fedora 39?

13:02 <rwmjones> hmm maybe we're supposed to only boot with EFI now?

13:02 <davidlt> rwmjones, F39 kernels are EFI ZBOOT, UEFI firmware is required

13:03 <davidlt> This looks like QEMU and technically this should work with EDK2 (and U-boot, but I didn't get to test it)

13:03 <rwmjones> yes it's a qemu vm

13:03 <rwmjones> one I've been upgrading since F37

13:03 <davidlt> I haven't finish this work on bootflow thus F39 (and above) kernels will not work in existing setup

13:03 <rwmjones> ok thanks

13:04 <davidlt> and yes, I am already thinking about building a new kernel in F38 (because of this)

13:04 <rwmjones> yeah so the background to this is I'm having a problem with KVM and I wanted to try a newer kernel to see if that would fix it

13:05 <rwmjones> but actually I'll try newer qemu first (since the crash is in qemu for some reason)

13:05 <rwmjones> by "KVM" I mean KVM emulated by qemu-system-riscv64 on x86-64 host

13:06 <davidlt> Yeah, which surprisingly is still called KVM :)

13:07 <davidlt> I am getting busy (more and more) with Fedora 38 -> Fedora 40 mass rebuild, thus no ETA on a new kernel or finish UEFI bootflow

13:08 <davidlt> and Fedora 39 is basically F38 + minimal changes (incl. kernel)

13:08 <davidlt> I really planned to use F39 and F40 for different experiments, but that was taking too long

13:13 <rwmjones> yup!

13:20 <davidlt> Someone posted dates for RTL freeze and tapeout (not really confirmed)

13:20 <davidlt> It does seem that this chip is not even at RTL freeze

13:21 <davidlt> Thus I am not sure I trust that 9-10 months statement