10:29 <beerman> jue: looks like newsboat needs https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/pull/2056 or at least if we want to stick with gcc 12.1

10:30 <beerman> i have rebuilt everything in opt with it and now work through the failures to see if its fixable or not, and most seem to be

10:31 <beerman> https://dpaste.com/3B2K9LRJ6 this would be another one for you: gtk-theme-adwaita seems to enable both gtk and gtk3, but with gtk3 already being "the old one", maybe it would make sense to not hard depend on gtk2 anymore, and only enable it if the user has it installed

10:33 <beerman> mysql seems to not be able to use openssl 3.0 so far.. which is a bummer, not even the newer version 8.x

10:39 <beerman> https://dpaste.com/E8ZUJYPFH opt/pear is weird - is there a way to get these files into the footprint to have them removed with pear?

10:49 <beerman> even when you remove these files, it will auto create them https://dpaste.com/CRRW5PC7T

10:49 <beerman> and they are left behind when you remove pear again, that sucks

10:56 <beerman> http://sprunge.us/KVjhJ0 samba has a footprint mismatch, it doesn't seem to depend on krb5 either

11:53 <beerman> jaeger: seems like opt/slim fails to build since gcc 11 http://sprunge.us/Ya6aVv gentoo has a fix https://bugs.gentoo.org/786498

17:12 <jue> beerman: thanks for the hints, will look at them tomorrow, guess that's all related to 3.7?

17:12 <beerman> jue: no problem. i did rebuild all of opt due to gcc 12.1 and now try to see if that still fits into 3.7

17:13 <beerman> i have no idea if that affects 3.6 as well so a seperate test would make sense, but with 3.7 around the corner I dunno if its worth your energy

17:13 <beerman> tevent seems to need cmocka, but i haven't gotten to check up on that yet

17:13 <beerman> i can post the full opt diff from my 3.7 container later

17:14 <jue> ok

17:23 <beerman> jaeger: mingw-w64-binutils tries to overwrite a file from binutils http://sprunge.us/e18jfn

18:14 <beerman> jue: squid on gcc11 gives a footprint mismatch https://dpaste.com/DXXVAP99E on gcc 12.1 it fails to build alltogether.. http://sprunge.us/2SKM8p

18:15 <beerman> the NEW are surely from my dirty desktop - I am more interested in the MISSING files

18:15 <beerman> maybe these are build if ldap is not around?

21:09 <beerman> https://dpaste.com/CF869CVQW these are the remaining offending ports for me, everything else works after some minor touches: http://sprunge.us/JNeuSc

21:11 <beerman> i can share patches as needed or commit things if you want jaeger jue whatever works best for you..

21:22 <beerman> anyway, I'd say we will probably be fine with jumping onto gcc 12.1 for the most part, any objections?