<zmatt>
Guest89: the powervr drivers are packaged separately from the kernel, so if you update only the kernel then you may need to separately install the driver package... though if the kernel gets updated by a simple apt upgrade but the powervr module doesn't then that does seem like a bit of an oversight
<zmatt>
btw in the future don't copy-paste multi-line output into chat, it's rather spammy... use a paste service like pastebin.com to share text
<zmatt>
you can revert to your previous kernel, or more generally switch to any installed kernel, by changing the uname_r variable in /boot/uEnv.txt
<static_rocket>
@Guest89:libera.chat: you can just fetch the current installed version of the kernel (something like `apt list --installed | grep kernel`) and select the corresponding um/km packages from `apt search sgx`. unfortunately i don't remember the package names entirely and I tend to avoid using apt so take this with a grain of salt
<Guest89>
Hey I am willing & eager to learn. What should I use instead of apt? Back in the day I just used the BSD ports tree and built things I don't know best practices anymore
<static_rocket>
i dislike debian's approach of having multiple kernel modules installed at once. good when everything's upstreamed and living with the kernel but it's a right headache for those stubborn few that like to live outside of the kernel tree
<zmatt>
Guest89: apt would generally be preferred
<zmatt>
unless you have strong opinions and know what you're doing
<zmatt>
:P
<static_rocket>
and of course apt doesn't make that process any *easier*
<zmatt>
static_rocket: not sure what you mean honestly
<zmatt>
static_rocket: I maintain out-of-tree stuff (including a custom driver) in my own fork of rcn's kernel repo and use its scripts to build custom debian packages
<zmatt>
debian also has a thing that can automatically recompile out-of-tree drivers from source code whenever the kernel is updated, I forgot what it's called
<static_rocket>
goofy dependency chains, inability to create proper package links when things need to move in lockstep, inability to specify when a package provides the same functionality as another (unless this has changed. i stopped playing with debian > 5 years ago...)
<zmatt>
I _think_ Provides: now works with real package names, iirc... this is something I also ran into in the past
<zmatt>
(and not just virtual package names)
<zmatt>
but don't hold me to that, maybe I misremember
<zmatt>
Guest89: what hardware are you using, an ai64 ?
<static_rocket>
ah, well that is a step forward. i understand why they don't like that. it is hacky, but it's better than relying on multiple maintainers to hash things out and agree on a virtual target
<Guest89>
zmatt AI64.
<zmatt>
Guest89: hmm, the kernel package has a Recommends: for the corresponding ti-sgx modules package
<zmatt>
so I think it should have gotten installed when updating bbb.io-kernel-5.10-ti-k3-j721e .. but it might depend on how apt is configured
<Guest89>
I am running "out-of-the-box" basically, and im totally willing to wipe/reinstall. I bought this as a play/learning platform
<Alex_BB>
trying to overwrite '/lib/modules/5.10.168-ti-arm64-r103/extra/j721e/pvrsrvkm.ko', which is also in package ti-sgx-23.1-j721e-modules-5.10.168-ti-arm64-r103 1bullseye
<Alex_BB>
but I notice thats not the path it complains about: Failed to load /lib/modules/5.10.140-00001-g69e7a81501b2/extra/pvrsrvkm.ko: No such file or directory
<zmatt>
uhhhhhh
<Alex_BB>
I need to update pvrsctrl?
<zmatt>
no, hold on lemme see what's going on here
<Alex_BB>
ok. afk for a min
<zmatt>
Alex_BB: btw I don't think you normally should have to use pvrsrvctl at all
<zmatt>
but it does seem like a particular ti-sgx modules package is already installed for your kernel... I don't really understand why that's not the same one as what's Recommended: by the kernel package, or what exactly these different versions are
<zmatt>
those packages should definitely have Conflicts: directives on each other if they're mutually exclusive
<Alex_BB>
It might have been installed by the Imagination University .run file. I am willing to start over if there is another recommended path. I am using the demo located here https://university.imgtec.com/teaching-download/
<zmatt>
oh I don't know anything about that, I'd suggest making sure to use whatever exact image they're using / saying to use and not perform any installation steps other than what's stated by them
<zmatt>
in general the powervr drivers are extremely fussy and fragile to get working
<Alex_BB>
If you could point me to a "Getting started" guide that works? I just want to see how this AI thing works, then I want to break down the tools that make it work to see how it works, and so on. My knowledge of things is so out of date I am basically a noob again.
<zmatt>
I'm sorry, I haven't worked with any of this.. I don't even own an ai64 yet, and last time I did anything with powervr drivers was quite a few years ago on a beaglebone black
<zmatt>
the AI stuff has nothing to do with the imgtec/powervr stuff though I think
<Alex_BB>
No worries I appreaciate the help. Especially if you don't own one yet. This is my first SBC and my first arm based computer (well, I do own a PSOC microcontroller). I saw some interviews that emphasize Beagle's commitment to open source so I purchased one. I think its far more interesting to see how things work when there are no binary
<Alex_BB>
blobs... I can follow the logic. I think I started off on the wrong path for my goals...
<zmatt>
Alex_BB: heh, and then you picked powervr as one of the first things to experiment with, which is one of the few parts that requires binary blobs
<Alex_BB>
lol I know.
<zmatt>
there's definitely something wonky about the powervr package though, I should poke rcn-ee about this
<Alex_BB>
The dmesg output is no longer relevent (When I finally found a sdcard that worked, I was able to use the full image not the stock image updated as per "getting started" instructions
<Alex_BB>
I had to find a sdcard that the kernel would like first. I was getting error -110 upon insertion. I finally went to BestBuy and bought the oldest/slowest sdcard on the shelf and it worked.
<zmatt>
uhh, normally any card should work
<zmatt>
-110 means it wasn't getting any response from the card... any chance it was just making poor contact or something?
<Alex_BB>
On the beagleboard forums others have the issue too... recommendation was "try another one"
<zmatt>
oh weird
<Alex_BB>
Something wierd in the newest cards. Maybe with the U with a 3 inside doesn't work. The one that works is U with a 1
<Alex_BB>
And its almost sure to be a kernel issue, since uboot does get the process started
<zmatt>
the only thing I can think is that maybe it's negotiating some bus transfer speed that doesn't actually work reliably... if that's the case then presumably the dts just needs to be fixed to mark that bus transfer speed as unsupported
<Alex_BB>
Yeah I tried troubleshooting that for too long. I found a kernel.org thread even and double checked the patch they used was in the kernel lol I am stubborn sometimes.
<zmatt>
I'm still looking at the various ti-sgx packages for arm64... https://pastebin.com/raw/sTgjWb78 there seem to be four driver versions, one unversioned (in the package name anyway), a 1.15, a.18, and... 23.1 (typo for 1.23 ??)
<zmatt>
but like... why does the unversioned one have no firmware package? I guess maybe it's included with the ddx-um (the userspace libs)
<zmatt>
more importantly, why do 1.18 and 23.1 have no -ddx-um for j721e, only for am62
<zmatt>
you definitely need matching sgx driver version for modules + ddx-um + firmware
<zmatt>
and modules obviously also matching the kernel version
<Alex_BB>
You have given me things to look at. I will spend some time trying to understand them later. I really appreciate the apt-cache command you told me about earlier. My knowledge was literally at apt update; apt upgrade.
<Alex_BB>
I will leave this open but I am going to watch some tv with mom for now.... For those lurking who may be interested in the SD Card issue, one that does not work is the Gamestop 64gb card. The SanDisk Ultra Plus does work.
<zmatt>
so I think you somehow ended up with mismatched packages.. though I also think that the packages themselves should prevent that from happening through the use of appropriate package constraints
<Alex_BB>
I really appreciate the help zmatt and static_rocket. Thank you both
<Alex_BB>
It might have been the "AI Demo" package that is hacky it might have installed the mismatched package.
<Alex_BB>
My next plan will be start over and I will start with the /opt AI demos. I will also try them before apt upgrade, which did update the kernel. Then I will try the AI Demo, again before updateing on-board packages. Basically try things a step at a time and see if its just not working or if the update breaks things.
<Alex_BB>
Have a great afternoon and happy mothers day to any mothers out there.
starblue has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
starblue has joined #beagle
rob_w has joined #beagle
ikarso has joined #beagle
Guest15 has joined #beagle
Guest15 has quit [Client Quit]
Shadyman has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
florian has joined #beagle
starblue has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
starblue has joined #beagle
Alex_BB has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
ft has quit [Quit: leaving]
starblue has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
starblue has joined #beagle
nslu2-log has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
nslu2-log has joined #beagle
ikarso has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
rob_w has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
buckket has quit [Quit: buckket]
buckket has joined #beagle
waldo323__ has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
waldo323 has joined #beagle
NishanthMenon[m] has joined #beagle
florian has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]
vagrantc has joined #beagle
Guest67 has joined #beagle
Guest67 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
mattb0ne has joined #beagle
<mattb0ne>
does the beagle have any hw component that makes driving a stepper with a pulse strain easier
<mattb0ne>
I was driving a stepper from python toggling a low high signal but I want to make a real fast pulse train from the PRU
mattb0ne has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mattb0ne has joined #beagle
<zmatt>
PRU would be the most obvious choice yes
<zmatt>
there's also hacks you could do with a PWM output, but that would be more complicated and less reliable than just using PRU
<zmatt>
there's lots of ways to generate signals really, now that I think about it
<mattb0ne>
just to be clear using the EHRPWM is using the PRU
ft has joined #beagle
xet7 has joined #beagle
<zmatt>
didn't you stop using the encoder, hence you got a spare pru core?
<zmatt>
otherwise it depends on the timing constraints whether or not you can successfully combine the tasks on one core
<zmatt>
your pru core is currently mostly idle, waiting for the next load cell measurement