00:13 <whitequark[cis]> <lonjil[m]> "Forgive me if I missed something..." <- that's all there currently is

00:13 <whitequark[cis]> I think what's in the guide should be enough for simple work; is there any issue you're hitting?

00:17 <lonjil[m]> whitequark[cis]: I'm following the Amaranth translation of Bruno Levy's "from blinker to risc-v", which uses `fsm.state` in a signal assignment inside of a `with m.FSM() as fsm:` block, which did not work. I just discovered that it does work if I put the assignment outside of the FSM block.

00:20 <lonjil[m]> At first, I thought that fsm.state had been deprecated and removed, but I didn't find anything like that in the changelog, so with no documentation about it I was left unsure.

00:28 <whitequark[cis]> it's just undocumented right now

00:28 <whitequark[cis]> there's been some issues around it, but it's not planned to be deprecated

04:25 <bl0x[m]> <lonjil[m]> "I'm following the Amaranth..." <- Can you open an issue in the repo? Then I can fix whatever is not working. Thanks!

07:09 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] jfng opened pull request #94: wishbone: add Wishbone-attached SRAM. - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/pull/94

08:53 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] jfng opened pull request #95: Implement RFC 70: unify naming of `MemoryMap` resources and windows. - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/pull/95

08:57 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] github-merge-queue[bot] created branch gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-95-f5d44534ed729cc1f7419fffef4da679c4b84c56 - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc

08:57 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] jfng closed issue #93: Tracking issue for RFC 70: unify the naming of `MemoryMap` resources and windows - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/issues/93

08:58 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc] github-merge-queue[bot] pushed 1 commit to main [+0/-0/±10] https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/compare/f5d44534ed72...058057f38b18

08:58 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc] jfng 058057f - Implement RFC 70: unify naming of `MemoryMap` resources and windows.

08:58 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] github-merge-queue[bot] deleted branch gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-95-f5d44534ed729cc1f7419fffef4da679c4b84c56 - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc

08:58 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] jfng closed issue #69: `MemoryMap.add_resource()` should support integers in resource names - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/issues/69

08:58 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] jfng closed pull request #95: Implement RFC 70: unify naming of `MemoryMap` resources and windows. - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/pull/95

08:59 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-lang/amaranth-lang.github.io] whitequark pushed 1 commit to main [+0/-0/±8] https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-lang.github.io/compare/e5fabd594c27...78e1b9279082

08:59 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-lang/amaranth-lang.github.io] github-merge-queue[bot] 78e1b92 - Deploying to main from @ amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc@058057f38b18537585a02e1db7955a184a1c5334 🚀

14:08 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-soc] whitequark reviewed pull request #94 commit - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-soc/pull/94#discussion_r1662608153

14:23 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] kivikakk commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203361082

14:38 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] whitequark commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203395146

14:39 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] whitequark commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203396951

14:42 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] kivikakk commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203404770

14:46 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] whitequark commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203414486

14:48 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] whitequark commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203417077

15:25 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] kivikakk commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203525099

17:11 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] whitequark commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2203871977

19:35 <_whitenotifier-9> [amaranth-yosys] kivikakk commented on issue #11: Thoughts on including optimization passes? - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth-yosys/issues/11#issuecomment-2204198740