04:59 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal-apps] azonenberg opened issue #579: Create custom widget for "file in data directory" - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal-apps/issues/579

04:59 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal-apps] azonenberg labeled issue #579: Create custom widget for "file in data directory" - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal-apps/issues/579

05:01 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal] azonenberg closed pull request #762: Add Glitch Removal Filter - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/pull/762

05:01 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal] azonenberg pushed 2 commits to master [+4/-0/±6] https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/compare/04655b3fae83...c0bef497a0fa

05:01 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal] 602p 252bdfa - Add Glitch Removal Filter

05:01 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal] azonenberg c0bef49 - Merge pull request #762 from 602p/glitch_removal Add Glitch Removal Filter

05:01 <azonenberg> @louis ok i merged the filter. please also send a companion PR for scopehal-docs to document it when you get a chance

05:06 <azonenberg> Also, i just realized it's high time *ngscopeclient* got some docs written

05:06 <azonenberg> I'm going to work on making some stuff for that

05:07 <azonenberg> reusing chapters from the glscopeclient docs where it makes sense and writing new content elsewhere

06:31 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal-docs] azonenberg pushed 1 commit to master [+6/-0/±5] https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal-docs/compare/500eacf89f61...1bcdb86ad2db

06:31 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal-docs] azonenberg 1bcdb86 - Initial work on ngscopeclient manual, began forking it away from the glscopeclient manual although some sections are used in both

07:26 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal] smunaut opened pull request #769: USB2PMADecoder: Use different threshold for Differential and Single Ended - https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal/pull/769

07:29 <d1b2> <tnt> Sorry for the double PR, should probably have been included in the PR from last night. This doesn't really affect the result of the decode, but more cosmetic to avoid spurious SE11 detected at the beginning of the packet. Previously https://i.imgur.com/JLCS1Vl.png would be detected as SE11. (when it rises to Vcm)

13:56 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal-docs] azonenberg pushed 1 commit to master [+3/-0/±2] https://github.com/glscopeclient/scopehal-docs/compare/1bcdb86ad2db...1d701db49fa2

13:56 <_whitenotifier-9> [scopehal-docs] azonenberg 1d701db - Added sections for load, meter, and RF generator drivers

23:22 <d1b2> <Nate> which o-scope drivers might be the most mature? Looking at high speeds o-scope (maybe >= 1 GHz bandwidth)

23:49 <azonenberg> nate: Teledyne LeCroy is my daily driver

23:49 <azonenberg> any of their MAUI based scopes should be well supported and fast

23:51 <azonenberg> I have a WaveRunner 8404M-MS and SDA 816Zi-A at home that are my primary dev scopes, we also have a WaveSurfer 3034 (slow, ARM based instead of x86) and a WaveRunner 9104 at work

23:51 <azonenberg> all of which work well

23:51 <azonenberg> Pico 6000E series will beat LeCroy in waveform streaming rate over USB3, but can't match them in sample rate or bandwidth

23:51 <azonenberg> Tek MSO6 works reasonably well but is a lot slower

23:52 <azonenberg> and their firmware is super buggy

23:52 <azonenberg> I've heard good things about the R&S RTO6 series but i dont know how mature that driver is, @louis wrote it and would know more than me

23:53 <azonenberg> Siglent's higher end scopes like the SDS6000A series work, but are quite slow (maybe 3 WFM/s at shallow memory dropping to <1 with all channels active)

23:53 <azonenberg> Recent Keysight scopes (Infiniium family) are probably our biggest hole in terms of driver support, although we do have good drivers for a lot of older Agilent scopes

23:55 <azonenberg> But yeah, any x86 based LeCroy (i.e. not a modern WaveSurfer which works but is slow, or a pre 2000 VxWorks based scope which uses a different command set entirely) would be my first recommendation for a higher end scope