05:46 <re_irc> <@d​isasm-ewg:m​atrix.org> almindor: Well, `UnsafeCell`?

05:47 <re_irc> <@d​isasm-ewg:m​atrix.org> Or evel `Cell::as_ptr`

06:26 <re_irc> <@b​urrbull:m​atrix.org> What all you think about backporting non-breaking changes to embedded-hal 0.2.x ?

06:26 <re_irc> <@b​urrbull:m​atrix.org> https://github.com/rust-embedded/embedded-hal/pull/301

06:26 <re_irc> <@b​urrbull:m​atrix.org> For example i2c 10 address support, OutputPin::set_state, IoPin and maybe something other

06:30 <re_irc> <@d​isasm-ewg:m​atrix.org> I think it's a good idea, because 0.2->1.0 transition will take another few years

06:43 <re_irc> <@m​arcuss2:t​edomum.net> How well is the nrf52 series supported?

06:53 <re_irc> <@b​urrbull:m​atrix.org> marcuss2: https://github.com/nrf-rs

10:21 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> does anyone here know how I debug a stackoverflow in a proc_macro? :D

10:27 <re_irc> <@h​enrik_alser:m​atrix.org> debug like?

10:48 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> as in figure out the issue :D

10:49 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> until now I cannot even get a stacktrace

10:49 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> guess thats because of SIGABRT

10:56 <re_irc> <@j​amesmunns:m​atrix.org> marcuss2: I'd probably say the nrf52 is probably the second most widely used family of chips, after the stm32.

11:00 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> In rust most likely yeah :)

11:18 <re_irc> <@h​enrik_alser:m​atrix.org> yatekii: Do you have a suspect?

11:44 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> I do not :D I Also have a convict :D

11:44 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> ```rust

11:44 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> impl From<BorrowedParseError<'_>> for Error {

11:44 <re_irc> ... long message truncated: https://psion.agg.io/_matrix/media/r0/download/psion.agg.io/5ef2e345a53e7099dba40b6553241fcee013f3145287d92d9d618efcf8d8c269 (6 lines)

11:44 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> error.into()

11:44 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> fn from(error: BorrowedParseError) -> Self {

11:44 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> lol

11:48 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> Anyways, it's fixed now :D I was just stupid :) Also I found this via the rust-analyzer debug functionality. I just had to pull out all my macro code into an example :)

12:06 <re_irc> <@y​atekii:m​atrix.org> i wish proc_macros were a bit more complete. its one of the most awesome rust features

12:15 <re_irc> <@s​h3rm4n:m​atrix.org> burrbull: I like it, because 1. it would make the transition smoother (as some traits are already implemented) 2. get some more experience witht the traits to maybe flesh out difficult areas for 1.0 3. Many of these traits are useful now and should not wait for 1.0