ChanServ changed the topic of #mlpack to: "mlpack: a fast, flexible machine learning library :: We don't always respond instantly, but we will respond; please be patient :: Logs at http://www.mlpack.org/irc/
pie3 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
favre49 has joined #mlpack
< zoq>
say4n: Thanks
< say4n>
zoq: :)
pie3 has joined #mlpack
< himanshu_pathak[>
Hey sakshamb189 are you there?
< sakshamb189[m]>
yes I am here
< himanshu_pathak[>
I have reported the accuracy on my pr.
< himanshu_pathak[>
So, we can say that our SVM is working fine
< himanshu_pathak[>
If you have any issue with code please do a review
< sakshamb189[m]>
yes I'll give a review.
< sakshamb189[m]>
In the meantime can you start working on DBN and open a PR for that.
< himanshu_pathak[>
<sakshamb189[m] "In the meantime can you start wo"> Ok I will do that during this week
< himanshu_pathak[>
Today I will try to work on cli bindings
< sakshamb189[m]>
I think that can also be in a separate PR.
< himanshu_pathak[>
sakshamb189: Yeah I have already opened a separate pr for that
< sakshamb189[m]>
Also can you open an issue about any further optimisations to the SMO code that might be possible and you have not implemented.
< sakshamb189[m]>
Because afaik you were referring the simplified SMO version from stanford lectures right?
< himanshu_pathak[>
> <@sakshamb189:matrix.org> Also can you open an issue about any further optimisations to the SMO code that might be possible and you have not implemented.
< himanshu_pathak[>
> Because afaik you were referring the simplified SMO version from stanford lectures right?
< himanshu_pathak[>
Yup that is also needed I think I can do that after GSOC I will open an issue
< himanshu_pathak[>
<sakshamb189[m] "In the meantime can you start wo"> So, our primary target for this week will be opening a pr for dbn
< sakshamb189[m]>
yes it would be great if you can do that.
< sakshamb189[m]>
Is there anything else we need to discuss?
< himanshu_pathak[>
I will use the code that is already present in our rbm and try to use it as a layer or you want me to write code for rbm also
< sakshamb189[m]>
No you should try to use that to avoid redundancy.
< sakshamb189[m]>
or make any changes to that code as required so, that it can be used with DBN.
< himanshu_pathak[>
sakshamb189: Yup we have pretty good implementation of visitors
< himanshu_pathak[>
<himanshu_pathak[ "sakshamb189: Yup we have pretty "> I will try to use them
< himanshu_pathak[>
Backward and forward visitor in ann
< sakshamb189[m]>
alright sure sounds good
< himanshu_pathak[>
<sakshamb189[m] "alright sure sounds good "> Ok anything else you want to discuss.
< sakshamb189[m]>
No, let me know if you have any doubts otherwise we can meet next week.
< himanshu_pathak[>
sakshamb189: Yup I will have a great week ahead.
< himanshu_pathak[>
* sakshamb189: Yup I will ask if got stuck have a great week ahead.
< sakshamb189[m]>
yeah you too himanshu_pathak bye