06:42 < Kunvar_thaman> I was wondering if I should submit a pre-proposal which maybe a mentor could review and provide me some feedback on how my final project should be (Implement GANs, BRNs and RBFN - Essential modules).

06:45 < Kunvar_thaman> This way my project proposal would be alligned with MLPack goals properly

07:14 < rainbowtiara> Hey i would like to build up a new module which evaluates conditional entropy on time series data using tree traversal in either of c++ or python.

07:14 < rainbowtiara> I have worked on this before but want to enhance its improvement in terms of both time and space complexity

07:15 < rainbowtiara> Hoping to get a help from you guys :)

08:50 < jenkins-mlpack2> Yippee, build fixed!

08:50 < jenkins-mlpack2> Project docker mlpack nightly build build #238: FIXED in 3 hr 36 min: http://ci.mlpack.org/job/docker%20mlpack%20nightly%20build/238/

10:09 < zoq> Kunvar_thaman: Hello, once the submission process is open, we are able to review and comment on proposals.

16:34 < Kunvar_thaman> zoq: Okay, that'll be on 26th feb, right? Should I just keep going through code and come up with good architecture till then? There are a couple of past projects I found I can improve upon

17:05 < travis-ci> mlpack/ensmallen#131 (ensmallen-1.13.2 - a83ff61 : Ryan Curtin): The build passed.

17:05 < travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/mlpack/ensmallen/compare/b70174926d72^...a83ff61cbd42

17:05 < travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/mlpack/ensmallen/builds/494990506

17:44 < zoq> Kunvar_thaman: I think it's March 25, but we can discuss projects before the Student application period begins.

19:09 < mulx10> hello everyone

19:10 < mulx10> can someone please tell me which version of python are we using for gym_tcp_api ?

19:10 < mulx10> thank you

19:11 < zoq> mulx10: python2.7 and python3 should work

19:15 < zoq> mulx10: You can you the version you used to install gym.

19:36 < KimSangYeon-DGU> Hi rcurtin, I have a question. In https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/pull/1666#discussion_r257802414, the `Equation` is about a single observation. but, the `Code` is on multiple observations(column-wise). So I'm sorry for confusing you with that. So, in case of multiple observations, is the code correct?? (we have `invCov` as a arma::vec)

19:36 < KimSangYeon-DGU> I didn't noticed that...

19:41 < KimSangYeon-DGU> *isn't the code corrrect??

19:42 < KimSangYeon-DGU> Oops.. *correct

19:45 < KimSangYeon-DGU> I'll move this question to the PR page, so that you can check if you have a chance later.

19:58 < rcurtin> KimSangYeon-DGU: sorry, my error on that one

19:58 < rcurtin> reviewing too many PRs too quickly :)

20:00 < mulx10> zoq: thanks

20:12 < KimSangYeon-DGU> rcurtin: No problem. :)

20:14 < KimSangYeon-DGU> I think you are so busy, so I wanted for you to review my PR more easily.

20:15 < KimSangYeon-DGU> I will do comments on my work more clearer.

20:17 < KimSangYeon-DGU> (I meant I will leave comments on my works more clearer)

20:18 < KimSangYeon-DGU> Thanks for your hard works. It's amazing. :)

20:51 < rcurtin> oops, mlpack-bot marked some things as stale that it shouldn't have (stuff labeled with 's: keep open')... should be fixed now