verne.freenode.net changed the topic of #mlpack to: http://www.mlpack.org/ -- We don't respond instantly... but we will respond. Give it a few minutes. Or hours. -- Channel logs: http://www.mlpack.org/irc/
travis-ci has joined #mlpack
< travis-ci>
mlpack/mlpack#224 (master - ef29032 : Marcus Edel): The build was broken.
< zoq>
hm, maybe I can use static weights, let's see
< naywhayare>
is it just a random test failure?
< zoq>
yeah
< naywhayare>
I hate tracking those down... I always end up running 'while(true); do bin/mlpack_test -t SuiteName/TestName; done' and watching it for 100 iterations or so
< naywhayare>
the HMM tests and the GMM tests are especially bad for that. I had to keep widening the tolerances; I wonder if the tests are still meaningful...
< zoq>
The easiest way is to go with random weights and just increase the iterations, but this would also increase the run time. So, I decided to go with static weights, which might decrease the meaningfulness of the test.
< zoq>
I wouldn't call the build broken, because of one failed test ...
travis-ci has joined #mlpack
< travis-ci>
mlpack/mlpack#225 (master - f5893d5 : Marcus Edel): The build was fixed.