ChanServ changed the topic of #linux-rockchip to: Rockchip development discussion
stikonas has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kevery has joined #linux-rockchip
vagrantc has quit [Quit: leaving]
lurchi__ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
lurchi_ has joined #linux-rockchip
lurchi_ is now known as lurchi__
kevery has quit [Quit: kevery]
f476 has joined #linux-rockchip
f476_ has joined #linux-rockchip
f476 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
f476 has joined #linux-rockchip
f476__ has joined #linux-rockchip
f476___ has joined #linux-rockchip
f476_ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
f476 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
f476__ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
f476 has joined #linux-rockchip
f476___ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
f476 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
f476 has joined #linux-rockchip
f476_ has joined #linux-rockchip
f476__ has joined #linux-rockchip
f476 has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
f476_ has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
f476__ has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
stikonas has joined #linux-rockchip
shailangsa has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
lopsided98_ has joined #linux-rockchip
lopsided98 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
shailangsa has joined #linux-rockchip
Jmabsd has joined #linux-rockchip
<Jmabsd> Guys, there as an RK3399 based laptop before called Acer C101. By chance do you know if anyone succeeded with installing alternative OS/Linux on it??
<mps> Jmabsd: is it chromebook
<Jmabsd> mps: It is !!!!
<Jmabsd> yes!!!
<Jmabsd> mps: Do you know the ARM64 laptops market, I could be glad to buy a small good one. The Asus C101 has the RK3399, it should be one of the "less bad" ones
<mps> looks like it gru flavor
<mps> I run linux on rk3399 gru-kevin for about 5 years
<Jmabsd> RK3399 has PCIe support right. the PineBook Pro has M.2 but is sold out
<Jmabsd> hm, gru-kevin what is that
<Jmabsd> thanks for pointing to! indeed looks positive
<Jmabsd> mps: oh wait wait wait, there is also the "Asus Chromebook Plus"!!! I had no idea they made two
<mps> gru-kevin is a variant of base gru chromebook board, gru-bob is another
<Jmabsd> apologies - *Samsung* made the other one. so Acer made one RK3399 laptop, and Samsung one. interesting.
<mps> Jmabsd: yes, my daughter use "Asus Chromebook Plus" daily, I had to give it to her ;)
<mps> these two is very similar
<mps> s/is/are/
<mps> she use krita for graphic design on it
<mps> so it is still quite good enough though it is old
<mps> though in my experience big distros are slower than alpine linux
<Jmabsd> mps: Is there both "Asus Chromebook Plus" and "Samsung Chromebook Plus"? =o
<Jmabsd> mps: are you aware of any small ARM64 laptops with an M.2 slot in it
<Jmabsd> oh, MT8195 looks like a fast CPU but with a low RAM cap, 4GB
<mps> Jmabsd: I don't know for any rk3399 board with more than 4GB ram
<mps> also about M.2 interface, I don't know if any chromebook have it
<mps> chromebooks are not designed for develepoers but for 'normal' (I would call them google users) users
<Jmabsd> are there any chromebooks with 8GB RAM??? 16??
<Jmabsd> mps: what about MT8192&MT8195 or any other ARM
<mps> Jmabsd: I didn't looked at buying chromebooks in last 3 years, waiting for first riscv64 board and hope than in future there will be notebooks on market
<Jmabsd> mps: For RiscV, SiFive Unmatched??
<mps> so don't know characteristics of new ones
<mps> Jmabsd: my son bought apple M1 to me and I'm satisified with it for now
<mps> linux works quite stable and fast on it
<Jmabsd> apple m1 is cool yea. Linux support soso
<Jmabsd> mhm
<mps> and thinking to buy few small riscv SBCs to experiment, play and learn
<Jmabsd> mps: the SiFive Unmatched has double the RAM. however sure that looks like a nice SBC
<mps> yes, I think 8GB ram is quite enough to learn and practice with riscv
<mps> hmm, 'around US$1,276', not so cheap
<Jmabsd> https://forums.lenovo.com/download/286114 Just curious does Linux work on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 laptop like ThinkPad X13s?
<Jmabsd> mps: look at this one ^ 32GB RAM and "PCIe SSD"
<mps> Jmabsd: I see some things in kernel git tree about snapdragon but I don't know how it works
<mps> Jmabsd: you can look at postmarketos.org devices and maybe find there which CPUs are supported by kernel
<Jmabsd> mps: I don't find any "gru-kevin" laptop mentioned online?
<Jmabsd> mps: RK3399 indeed has a cap of 4GB RAM. it's at first the RK3588 release now which can do more, it does 32GB.
<Jmabsd> ahh.
lurchi__ is now known as lurchi_
<wens> Jmabsd: MT8192 Acer Chromebook 514 (CB514-2H) has some 8GB RAM models
<wens> HP Chromebook x2 11-da0047nr (Qualcomm 7c?) also has 8GB
<wens> Jmabsd: AFAICK RK3399 Chromebooks have all been discontinued... I wanted to buy one last year and couldn't find any
<Jmabsd> wens: Wow! Wowow. Does Linux work well on them?
<wens> Jmabsd: device tree is definitely missing for MT8192, and there's stuff that's still being upstreamed. See linux-mediatek mailing list
<wens> Don't know about qualcomm
<Jmabsd> wens: RichN at #armbian via Discord bridge, appears to suggest that Qualcomm should work
<Jmabsd> wens: what is the pain of device tree missing? i didn't yet understand, there are two ways to autodetect hardware - "ACPI" and "device tree"?
<wens> you are missing the hardware description for your hardware, aka the kernel doesn't know anything about the platform
<lurchi_> Jmabsd: ARM devices in most cases don't have ACPI
<Jmabsd> wens: is the device tree easy to reconstruct?
<wens> anyway, for mt8192 it should sort of work, though you will have to track down patches from the mailing lists
<wens> Jmabsd: there are patches on the mailing list for it, though I'm not sure if there is one for that Acer device
<wens> or you can try picking it out from ChromeOS repositories, though that one is unlikely to work with upstream as is
<mps> Jmabsd: about mediatek you can join #linux-mediatek on libera
<Jmabsd> mps: oh of course. excellent idea.
<Jmabsd> mps: do you have any idea or prejudice about how fast Mediatek SoC:s are compared to Rockchip, Qualcomm, M1?
<wens> look for chromebook benchmarks?
<mps> it depends on CPU type, and most have A72 so speed is nearly same
<Jmabsd> mps: and A76 is one step better?
<mps> it should be, though I didn't had any box with A76
<Jmabsd> mps,wens: may I bug you with one more "does such an ARM laptop exist" question =) are you aware of any quite lightweight tiny nice ARM64 laptop, ideally with M.2 storage? 8GB RAM not needed 4GB is ok
<mps> Jmabsd: I don't know for any, which doesn't mean such things doesn't exists
<Jmabsd> mps,wens: interesting, someone points out "Cortex A78 cores perform like Skylake cores from what I've seen" and "Mediatek MT8195 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx have A78 cores"
stikonas has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
stikonas has joined #linux-rockchip
<Jmabsd> macc24: wow interesting, thank you
lurchi_ is now known as lurchi__
lurchi__ is now known as lurchi_
lurchi_ is now known as lurchi__
<Jmabsd> mps: You know what, if among somehow-consumer priced, somehow-carryable ARM64 the Apple M1 is the King right now, perhaps the HoneyComb/ClearFog LX1 is the queen just because it's quite decent afterall - maybe then the Rockchip RK3588 would be the prince of ARM right now, it's tinier than the LX2 motherboard, much less CPU power, but still proper PCI bus and 32GB RAM, and its physical footprint is quite small. The rest of the ARM market is noise
<Jmabsd> really - the Snapdragon could be something but come on the Linux support seems to be a decade in the future. Mediatek apparently will have no SBC:s but only a Chromebook, duh. eMag and Altera are nice but they are ATX big chassi sized.
<Jmabsd> macc24: ^ for you too :)
<macc24> "proper PCI bus"
<macc24> ...
<macc24> at least get the terminology right
<mps> Jmabsd: my experience is whatever I bought I made mistake
<mps> and I don't like to give advises around, choose that what you think will best be for you
<Jmabsd> macc24: 'PCIe support' or 'PCIe interface'
<Jmabsd> mps: the number of ARM64 computers that make sense is so small, asking myself what I missed
vagrantc has joined #linux-rockchip
<mps> my peach pi (samsung exynos-5800 arm32) chromebook doesn't have PCIe, not does Acer R13 (mediatek mt8172 arm64) but both were and still are usable for me
<mps> mt8173*
<mps> few months ago someone somewhere told me that in Poland used chromebooks could be bought for 100-200 euros
<Jmabsd> mps: Did you run Linux on them
<mps> Jmabsd: ofc, in last 28 years I use only linux
<mps> never used windows or macos
<Jmabsd> sure great.
<Jmabsd> I emailed this author https://www.linaro.org/blog/let-s-boot-the-mainline-linux-kernel-on-qualcomm-devices/ and asked him if Snapdragon has Linux support lol
<Jmabsd> it is so unclear
<mps> some have, look at kernel tree git log
<Jmabsd> mps: what is your URL for searching
<mps> Jmabsd: I have kernel git cloned to my local disk
<mps> it is a lot easier to search for things in git tree than on web
<Jmabsd> i see. do you see anything about the 8cx?
<mps> git grep 'regex patterns' or 'grep -r regex dir' and similar
<macc24> jakllsch: PCIe is not a bus fyi
<macc24> oops
<macc24> * Jmabsd
<macc24> and Jmabsd: i can assure you, snapdragon 7c chromebooks are well supported in cadmium.
<mps> I see `- Google Herobrine R1 Chromebook platform (Snapdragon 7c Gen 3)` in git log
<Jmabsd> macc24: but an interface?
<mps> looks like nothing with '8c' in name
<Jmabsd> oh, "Official IRC channel is #cadmium on Libera.chat" says https://github.com/Maccraft123/Cadmium , interesting
<psydroid> 8cx is exclusive to Windows laptops
<Jmabsd> psydroid: how do they ever enforce that
<Jmabsd> some secure boot magick to make the laptop totally closed??
<psydroid> Jmabsd, you can expect some of that and also a refusal to make documentation available or otherwise help out getting Linux to run on the chips
<psydroid> this is why I generally stay away from anything with Qualcomm chips
<Jmabsd> psydroid: What a disgusting, useless company
<psydroid> they are chasing the unicorn Windows market for ARM laptops that doesn't actually exist
<Jmabsd> I had that gutfeeling about them all the time
<Jmabsd> Idiots
<Jmabsd> they acquired that higher-performance ARM core company
<Jmabsd> smart move
<psydroid> and if Windows ends up running well on ARM chips and everything moves over, it will be Intel and AMD who will probably start heavily investing in RISC-V designs of their own to offer something competitive
<psydroid> yes, but I think that will also be tied to Windows
<Jmabsd> psydroid: They are nuts. Also I see Mediatek has a tendency to not allow any SBC:s for their SoC:s
<Jmabsd> Useless too, nuts
<psydroid> Jmabsd, Mediatek also wants in on the Windows on ARM market and has expressed a willingness to put Microsoft's Pluton in its chips
<psydroid> so yes, they are all useless and we may have better chances getting hardware from the Chinese mainland for running free operating systems
<Jmabsd> What is "Pluton", an execution squad?
<psydroid> like my Orange Pi, which is fine but slow
lurchi__ is now known as lurchi_
<Jmabsd> psydroid: omg.
<psydroid> Jmabsd, I think I've given you a lot of information today, but I hope you are aware of what minefield we are currently dealing with and only because companies prefer being malicious to simply selling good products that their customers may want to buy in large numbers
<psydroid> so yes, give me RK3588 or Apple M1
<Jmabsd> psydroid: OMG factor yea
<Jmabsd> duh. I actually had a bad gutfeeling about Qualcomm already
<psydroid> the at least I can run what I want on my devices
<psydroid> then*
<Jmabsd> I dislike Intel by the way, I also suspect the binary legacy tradition is "not secure"
<Jmabsd> yea
<Jmabsd> you can look at www.raptorcs.com and IBM Power,
<Jmabsd> those are Xeon grade.
<Jmabsd> psydroid: right thank you for sharing these various insights. yeah. i think for powerful ARM computing.. in this moment probably i'd just take an LX2
<Jmabsd> RK3588 doesn't really have OS support yet, not sure??? it needs a while
<Jmabsd> OpenBSD needs RK3588 donations.
<Jmabsd> but, an RK3588 SBC is/can be *smaller* than the LX2 which is a full mini-ITX chassi with a nanoATX PSU so like 18x18x7CM maybe
<Jmabsd> re speed not sure. i hope we'll see more good CPU:s come up also. like what about some really great RISCV.
<psydroid> Jmabsd, the only thing to be aware of when it comes to LX2, is that it may take a long time to arrive
<Jmabsd> you mean they process orders slow? =o
<Jmabsd> by the way Raspberry Pi CM4 with 8GB RAM is an OK computer
<psydroid> the company isn't clear and open when it comes to delays
<psydroid> yes
<Jmabsd> A72.
<psydroid> I've heard of 2-3 months without much news as to when it will actually arrive
<Jmabsd> oh dear i see.
<psydroid> I have avoided Raspberry Pi so far because of its closed firmware based on ThreadX
<Jmabsd> what is ThreadX?
<Jmabsd> I'm aware Raspberry have closed firmware "issues" but I have not quite understood what extent or such, like how bad is it
<psydroid> that's why I went with an Orange Pi years ago
<psydroid> a real-time OS created by a company that was purchased by Microsoft last year
<psydroid> you are completely dependent on the Raspberry Pi Foundation
<psydroid> drivers have had issues for years
<psydroid> so while the Orange Pi was initially badly supported all the work done eventually got upstreamed and included in distributions such as Debian
lurchi_ is now known as lurchi__
<psydroid> I run pure Debian on mine with a custom kernel
<Jmabsd> psydroid: "Go to mrchromebox.tech to find out how to replace the BIOS with the FULL ROM, after which you should be able to boot from USB. I've never tried to boot OpenBSD from USB on a Chromebook, but I don't know any reason why you couldn't. I'd be curious how much of the Chromebook hardware is supported out of the box in OpenBSD 6.6." https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/e1heij/openbsd_66_on_a_samsung_chromebook/ hah
<psydroid> just because Debian's default kernel doesn't support the device, as far as I know
<Jmabsd> psydroid: what kind of driver issues have Raspberry had?
<Jmabsd> that hardware is supported on Debian is a good sign.
<Jmabsd> psydroid: uh what's the relevance in having a particular OS for firmware??
<Jmabsd> also Raspberry are closed source why, their Foundation wants to be sure noone copies them?...
<psydroid> Jmabsd, the graphics driver wasn't very good for a long time, although that may have changed
<psydroid> Raspberry Pi people came from Broadcom
<Jmabsd> interesting. i was always surprised why Raspberry became popular. They are really nothing special.
<Jmabsd> They are based in United Kingdom so they have a bit of language/culture benefit over an Asian garage startup
<psydroid> and they use Broadcom chips with closed components that they can't/won't reveal
<Jmabsd> in communication. but like, Raspberry have not been innovative. they did a relatively good job at organizing what they do
<Jmabsd> psydroid: what are they hiding
<Jmabsd> anyhow all that is odd.
<psydroid> Raspberry Pi has "good" support from the very first day
<Jmabsd> i looked at 2K res on a Pi and it looked OK. but i did not try video or such
<psydroid> it takes longer to achieve that with other boards
<psydroid> but at least it is developed by a real community
<psydroid> Jmabsd, just business decisions
<Jmabsd> https://mrchromebox.tech/#devices interesting so this is a firmware replacement web site for Intel based chromebooks, sigh.
<Jmabsd> psydroid: yeah Raspberry is just a random SBC company but with a bit more community
<Jmabsd> again i'm surprised why anyone ever bothered about Raspberry. maybe they have delivered a bit more consistently than others, and kept consistently low prices
<vagrantc> psydroid: does mainline linux support the device? wouldn't be terribly hard to add to debian's kernel if so...
<psydroid> they've removed barriers for newcomers who don't know much about Linux and don't want to fiddle with their installations
<psydroid> vagrantc, yes, I just build upstream vanilla kernels
<psydroid> I can share my config with you tomorrow
<psydroid> it would save me the hassle of building new kernels every few months
<vagrantc> raspberry took off because of the right marketing at the right time
<vagrantc> it'll be a bit hard for me to get it enabled without the board to test on, but maybe it'll be something obvious
<Jmabsd> psydroid: It seems to me a lot of products are made for a demographic of "stupid" customers that I am not even sure exists
<vagrantc> well, they successfully targeted the education market ...
<psydroid> I don't think I can do much about that unless I send you the board for the greater good of getting it supported out of the box on Debian
<vagrantc> they just bolted some spare GPUs onto a board that happened to have a CPU attached, as i understand it :)
<vagrantc> i had some orange pi plus 2 boards for a while, but haven't been using them recently ... not sure how different those are
<psydroid> I bought 2 of them 5 years ago and gave one to a friend
<psydroid> yeah :)
<vagrantc> pretty sure they're sunxi chips?
<psydroid> yes, allwinner a64
<psydroid> they don't sell it anymore
<psydroid> running debian arm64
<psydroid> I run everything on it, as in all of Debian
<psydroid> Jmabsd, even if the hardware ends up in a drawer, that's still a sale they made
<Jmabsd> Allwinner A64 was the first ultracheap ARM64.
<Jmabsd> 64bit.
<psydroid> in the future I should probably send a spare SBC to a Debian developer to help accelerate the process
<vagrantc> yup, i've got all sorts of them
<Jmabsd> RK3399 should be exponentially faster than Allwinner A64 shouldn't it
<Jmabsd> But the Allwinner was historic indeed
<psydroid> I didn't really think of it at the time because I thought one of the Debian developers would already have one
<psydroid> yes
<vagrantc> yeah, rk3399 is much nicer ... i've been running on pinebook-pro almost exclusively lately
<psydroid> and the great thing is that this $5 chip is well supported by Debian and probably other distributions
<Jmabsd> vagrantc: awaw I want a Pinebook Pro ISO =o
stikonas has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<Jmabsd> it's the most sensible ARM laptop. (apart from Apple.)
<Jmabsd> I browsed ARM chromebooks/netbooks now, they are so crap seriosly
<psydroid> Allwinner A200 might be interesting
<vagrantc> yeah, i ran on the original pinebook for most of a year too (had a phase of back to x86_64 for a while until i got the solar back up)
<psydroid> I haven't plunged into ARM laptops so far
<psydroid> I just ssh into my Orange Pi and do things there
<psydroid> of course with the root on an SSD and only using the SD card for u-boot, kernel, dtb and config