cr1901 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
cr1901 has joined #yosys
krispaul has joined #yosys
kristianpaul has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
FabM has joined #yosys
FabM has joined #yosys
derekn has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
derekn has joined #yosys
lxsameer has joined #yosys
FabM has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
bjorkintosh has joined #yosys
bjorkintosh has quit [Changing host]
bjorkintosh has joined #yosys
FabM has joined #yosys
FabM has joined #yosys
krispaul has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.5]
kristianpaul has joined #yosys
FaRiD has joined #yosys
FaRiD has left #yosys [#yosys]
FabM has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
FabM has joined #yosys
FabM has quit [Changing host]
FabM has joined #yosys
profi200 has joined #yosys
remexre has left #yosys [#yosys]
remexre has joined #yosys
lxsameer has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
so-offish has joined #yosys
<so-offish>
What's the command to run the Nix flake in the repo? I'm used to just doing "nix develop" if it's a flake, but I'm getting an error - I've already done `git submodule update --init --recursive`; it says it can't find a path to the abc source in the Nix store. Is it like, add --impure and there's a trick to it or something?
<jix>
it might be just out of date :/
<jix>
oh nm, said that due to something I misread and in that case I don't know anything about this
<so-offish>
darn
lxsameer has joined #yosys
<jix>
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/11859 seems and running `nix build '?submodules=1#'` in a yosys checkout avoids the error you mentioned (that I can reproduce otherwise)
lxsameer has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
<so-offish>
jix: Yup, that was it! I was running the line in the comment, which was `nix build ?submodules=1`
<so-offish>
What is that octothorpe doing there anyway?
<jix>
according to the issue and the linked issue from that issue it's a workaround to a recent nix bug in whatever parses that
<jix>
I'm not a regular nix user, so I don't know more about this
<so-offish>
Ohhh, that makes total sense to me: there have been a bunch of regressions in Cppnix, and there are some crufty spots in the semantics of the language itself; finding something like this is unsurprising to me.