<M9names[m]>
Please don't cross-post, this is pretty clearly an esp specific question. Anyone in here likely to answer it is also going to be in esp-rs.
Guest7282 has left #rust-embedded [Error from remote client]
Guest7282 has joined #rust-embedded
RoyBuitenhuis[m] has joined #rust-embedded
<RoyBuitenhuis[m]>
mabez: About that riscv32ima target. I suppose they implicitly asked me not to open the MCP to get it to tier 2. Do you know how to help the stabilization of Cargo build-std?
<RoyBuitenhuis[m]>
* Cargo build-std? Not sure if there's something in the list of blockers I could help with.
AdamHorden has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
marmrt[m] has quit [Quit: Idle timeout reached: 172800s]
AdamHorden has joined #rust-embedded
thejpster[m] has quit [Quit: Idle timeout reached: 172800s]
Noah[m]12 has quit [Quit: Idle timeout reached: 172800s]
<mabez[m]>
<RoyBuitenhuis[m]> "mabez: About that riscv32ima..." <- I'm not really familiar with cargo, and tbh I don't have the time to get familiar with it. It's probably worth checking the issue list ehuss mentioned in your PR and seeing whether they can be solved easily, or if they truly block stabilization or can be punted down the line
Guest7282 has left #rust-embedded [Error from remote client]
almindor[m] has joined #rust-embedded
<almindor[m]>
embedded-hal::serial is embedded-io now?
<dirbaio[m]>
yep
<almindor[m]>
is there a changelog/migration doc somewhere between 0.27 -> 1.0 ? I'm trying to bump e310x-hal but it's kinda confusing for things I'm not used to (e.g. I never did anything with the i2c abstractions)
Guest7282 has left #rust-embedded [Disconnected: Replaced by new connection]
cr1901 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
cr1901 has joined #rust-embedded
kenny has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.2.1]
avery71[m] has quit [Quit: Idle timeout reached: 172800s]
<f0rte[m]>
<M9names[m]> "Please don't cross-post, this is..." <- 9names: I understand that the spray-and-pray method may seem annoying, but you may notice I waited two hours before cross posting, and despite this received no replies (besides yours) in either group. I think that would indicate that it's logical to do so if I want hope of some traction. Not really sure what the "better" alternative would be.
<f0rte[m]>
* would be. Not that anyone "owes" me help, but the membership between groups are different, and the issue I'm experiencing, while I am assuming _may_ be esp-specific, may also not be.