10:20 <razzy> Hello, does file names in httpGate start new instances?

10:21 <razzy> I mean new processes?

10:31 <abu[7]> Hi razzy! You mean in the config file for httpGate?

10:33 <razzy> abu[7]: yes, I want to redirect few subdomains to different applications. I am confused where to set it up in "names" httpGate-config-file. is there different config file?

10:33 <abu[7]> The config files does not really have file names, but commands

10:34 <abu[7]> I see, you mean app 0 https://domain/foo/bar

10:34 <razzy> I searched irc log

10:36 <abu[7]> So if the port is zero

10:36 <razzy> abu, so every app will have 2 lines in config?

10:36 <abu[7]> then you can give an URL to redirect to

10:36 <abu[7]> No, just one line

10:37 <razzy> and foo/bar is destination of app?

10:38 <abu[7]> Yes, destination of redirect

10:38 <abu[7]> to "domain"

10:38 <razzy> i will try, thx

10:40 <razzy> httpgate still needs either port to redirect to, or commant to run

10:41 <abu[7]> Not the port to redirect to

10:42 <abu[7]> Normal is a non-zero port and a comand to start on this machine

10:42 <abu[7]> Else, if port is zero, the "command" is actually an URL to redirect to

10:43 <abu[7]> eg the line "razzy 0 https://google.com"

10:44 <abu[7]> then https://myServer/razzy will go to Google

10:59 <razzy> I am still confused. can I have https://www.dom.org redirect to ~/wwwapp and https://task.dom.org redirect to ~/taskapp on same machine? I see no way it could work. I can try different combinations

11:00 <abu[7]> On the *same* machine you need NO redirect

11:01 <razzy> i see one error in my thinking

11:01 <abu[7]> ok, httpGate runs on www.dom.org ?

11:01 <razzy> yes

11:02 <razzy> abu it is example

11:02 <abu[7]> Then you may have https://www.dom.org/name1 and https://www.dom.org/name2 and https://www.dom.org/foo etc

11:02 <abu[7]> yes

11:02 <abu[7]> so name1 and name2 and foo are lines in the config

11:03 <razzy> I see

11:03 <abu[7]> https://www.dom.org/name2 will connect to the port on that line, or starts the process if not running

11:04 <razzy> abu , now I understand :) thank you

11:04 <abu[7]> ☺

11:04 <razzy> abu[7]: I see clearly now. :)

11:06 <razzy> abu[7]: thank you for pointing on error in my thinking.

11:06 <abu[7]> Welcome! :)

15:39 <pablo_escoberg> Is there a way to tell if an entity is a new or existing record?  Or if an existing record has unsaved changes?  I can write a wrapper for `commit` to clear flags, which are set in the `T` method, but I hope I can avoid that.

15:48 <abu[7]> An entity exists if you find it via an index

15:48 <abu[7]> If it is deleted, it is not findable via an index, but might be still in the DB if the garbage collector has not run yet

15:50 <abu[7]> Then you normally don't know it. It is not findable after all ;)

15:50 <pablo_escoberg> Right, but if I use `request` is there a way to tell if it found something or created something?

15:50 <abu[7]> But *if* you know it, you can test it with (ext? X)

15:51 <abu[7]> Ah, I see

15:51 <abu[7]> No, you have to do the same as request manually

15:51 <pablo_escoberg> so if I want something I know is a new record, I should use `new` instead?

15:52 <abu[7]> 'request' tests with 'db' first

15:52 <abu[7]> Yes

15:52 <pablo_escoberg> perfect.  TY

15:52 <abu[7]> 'request' is just a convenience

15:52 <pablo_escoberg> ok, makes sense.  It is indeed convenient :).