teepee changed the topic of #openscad to: OpenSCAD - The Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller | This channel is logged! | Website: http://www.openscad.org/ | FAQ: https://goo.gl/pcT7y3 | Request features / report bugs: https://goo.gl/lj0JRI | Tutorial: https://bit.ly/37P6z0B | Books: https://bit.ly/3xlLcQq | FOSDEM 2020: https://bit.ly/35xZGy6 | Logs: https://bit.ly/32MfbH5
<InPhase> Happy studying to you. :)
<JordanBrown_> Happy to help.
ubitux has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
ubitux has joined #openscad
<quiliro> :-)
quiliro has quit [Quit: ĝis revido al morgaŭ]
pie_ has quit [Server closed connection]
pie_ has joined #openscad
snaked has joined #openscad
rawgreaze has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
LordOfBikes has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
teepee_ has joined #openscad
teepee has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
teepee_ is now known as teepee
rawgreaze has joined #openscad
LordOfBikes has joined #openscad
mmu_man has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
hypera1r has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
hyperair has joined #openscad
J23k68 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
lostapathy has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
lostapathy has joined #openscad
arebil has joined #openscad
clemens3 has quit [Server closed connection]
clemens3 has joined #openscad
hyvoid has joined #openscad
erectus has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
erectus has joined #openscad
califax has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
califax has joined #openscad
J23k has joined #openscad
peepsalot has quit [Server closed connection]
peepsalot has joined #openscad
J23k has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
guso78k has quit [Quit: Client closed]
califax has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
califax has joined #openscad
J23k has joined #openscad
<J23k> So i updated to 2023.11.08   and  rendering (manifold) is now closing without warning or error
misterfish has joined #openscad
<J23k> Oh now i got an error that  memory adress 0x0000000000000000018  could not be read
JordanBrown has joined #openscad
JordanBrown_ has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
L29Ah has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
rvt has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
rvt has joined #openscad
HumanG33k has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.8]
Guest65 has joined #openscad
Guest65 has quit [Client Quit]
teepee has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
teepee has joined #openscad
quiliro has joined #openscad
<quiliro> hello mates
<quiliro> !cheatsheet
<quiliro> cheatsheet!
<othx> cheatsheet is https://www.openscad.org/cheatsheet/ for the release version and https://www.openscad.org/cheatsheet/snapshot.html for the development snapshot versions
<quiliro> I see that page will not give the links to the documentation of each command if Javascript is blocked.
<quiliro> (as is in a text web browser)
<quiliro> sorry...that is not the problem....the problem is that the links do not have underline on them, so they are not noticeable
mmu_man has joined #openscad
raboof has quit [Server closed connection]
raboof has joined #openscad
<J23k> quiliro they have - probably your browser  or css  that removed them
<J23k> here https://imgur.com/a/TM3BkNM   (tested with 2 different browser)
<J23k> And also  without Javascript enabled
<J23k> sounds like PEBKAC to me
teepee has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
teepee has joined #openscad
teepee has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
teepee has joined #openscad
peeps[zen] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
peeps[zen] has joined #openscad
bozo16 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
teepee_ has joined #openscad
teepee has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
teepee_ is now known as teepee
lostapathy has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<JordanBrown> quiliro: the easiest way to get the cheat sheet is from the application; Help > Cheat Sheet.
<JordanBrown> I don't see any JavaScript in the cheat sheet; it looks like vanilla HTML and CSS.
lostapathy has joined #openscad
L29Ah has joined #openscad
erectus has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
erectus has joined #openscad
lostapathy has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
lostapathy has joined #openscad
ToAruShiroiNeko has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
ToAruShiroiNeko has joined #openscad
<gbruno> [github] zaitcev opened issue #4818 (building manifold: bound between 18446744022169944064 and 18446744073709551592 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/4818
<gbruno> [github] t-paul closed issue #4818 (building manifold: bound between 18446744022169944064 and 18446744073709551592 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/4818
<gbruno> [github] kintel opened pull request #4819 (Added test for #4815) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/pull/4819
<gbruno> [github] kintel pushed 4 additions (Added test for #4815) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/commit/1ff854259dcd524723bffec272d61395734e6ad5
<quiliro> thanks for the input
<quiliro> What is the problem with:
<quiliro> for (x=[-1,0.01,1]
<quiliro> {cube([x,1,cosh(x)], center=true)}
<quiliro> ?
<quiliro> I get an error.
<teepee> missing ) first line
<quiliro> oh!
<quiliro> dankon!
<quiliro> I have error in this line now:
<quiliro> {cube([x,1,cosh(x)],center=true)};
<teepee> swap } and ; at the end
<gbruno> [github] kintel pushed 8 additions 1 modifications 4 removals (Move some non-failing bug tests into the regular test groups) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/commit/beb8bdfc79f3376a3abf40d5c1c8b0692e776e1a
<gbruno> [github] kintel closed issue #13 (Export creates non-manifold STLs [$15]) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/13
kintel has joined #openscad
<kintel> Bug #13 Fixed - just took 13 years :)
<gbruno> [github] kintel opened pull request #4820 (Move some non-failing bug tests into the regular test groups) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/pull/4820
<teepee> oh my, not a good promise for bugs #100 and up :D
<quiliro> thanks teepee
<quiliro> forgot to ack
<gbruno> [github] kintel edited pull request #4819 (Added test for #4815) https://github.com/openscad/openscad/pull/4819
<quiliro> why do I only get 2 cubes out of https://termbin.com/v49z instead of 100 cubes?
<kintel> teepee Well, the good news is that the bug fixed itself, so perhaps we just have to wait :)
<teepee> yeah, but I'm mostly sure 100 years is not going to work for me ;-)
<peeps[zen]> quiliro: you are iterating over an array with 3 values. if you want a range, replace the comma=s with colon :
<quiliro> peeps[zen]: dankon....worked perfectly
<J23k> hope it didn't take 13years to fix the crashes from manifold in the current 2023.11.08
<quiliro> cube([(4*(1-abs(y)),.1,.1],center=true);
<quiliro> why does it give me an error? I tried with semicolon after abs(y) also.
<peeps[zen]> too many open parenthesis
<J23k> quiliro have you tried counting parenthesis?  also the build in editor will highlight the corresponding bracket if the cursor is near ..  using spaces can  help spotting  these mistakes easier
<quiliro> I see
<J23k> cube( [  4* ( 1-abs(y)  ), .1, .1 ], center=true );
<quiliro> thanks
<quiliro> I was trying several ways
<quiliro> reducing parenthesis as you did, worked
kintel has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
<J23k> just always set them in pairs  so  the moment you open one  - close it and put your input between  -  so you don't forget  that you opened it.
<quiliro> OK...good suggestion
<quiliro> I have https://termbin.com/obul . It is a square pulled by the corners to form a catenary. I need to make a structure to make it keep it stretched that way. Which form should the frame be?
<quiliro> a structure to keep it stretched that way *
<quiliro> I want to make a frame to keep it streched. How should it be?
<J23k> i gave you the module to use an extruded polygon  why you are not using it?
<quiliro> It is too complicated for me
<quiliro> let me check
<quiliro> I cannot find the version where there was an extruded polygon
<quiliro> I suppose that I overwrote it.
<quiliro> I amsorry
<peeps[zen]> quiliro, J23k: something like this? https://bpa.st/IE2A
<J23k> Ü
<quiliro> peeps[zen]: yes but it is only a sheet, not a thick object
<quiliro> It is a sheet of paper hanging from the corners
<peeps[zen]> you could replace the bottom corner points with the catenary loop going in the other direction, shifted down by a small thickness
<peeps[zen]> but overall i don't know what you are asking about what shape the frame should be
<peeps[zen]> is this still for something you are planning to construct by hand from wood strips?
<quiliro> or thick, yes
<quiliro> or thick wire, yes
<quiliro> not that way, J23k
<quiliro> if you pull a sheet of paper from all 4 corners but they are not on the same plane, you get a catenary
teepee has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
teepee has joined #openscad
<peeps[zen]> i think if you had paper like that, and look from perfectly vertical, the outline would no longer appear as perfect square/rectangle, due to some of the length of paper taken up by vertical distance
<peeps[zen]> is that the issue you are trying to solve?
<peeps[zen]> what i mean is that the length of the catenary curve needs to be fixed to the length of one side of your sheet
<peeps[zen]> so you may need to do some complex math to determine the actual catenary curve which results in that specific length
<peeps[zen]> either that or I think the sides of the paper may need to have a slight curve or something cut into them to produce a square projection when viewed from above
<peeps[zen]> quiliro: so you are mainly using openscad as a visual aid for your manual construction?
<peeps[zen]> the end goal is still just unclear to me
<peeps[zen]> or, how openscad fits into your process exactly
jonasbits has quit [Server closed connection]
jonasbits has joined #openscad