JohnnyonFlame has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
camus has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
camus has joined #linux-amlogic
<rockosov>
Hello! I apologize for the seemingly simple question, but may I ask what your goal is? Even if your ATF branch is successfully booted, it may not provide all the necessary Amlogic components for practical production use. I do not wish to belittle your contribution, but I am uncertain of how it will aid in the open source usage of ATF Amlogic for release devices. My team and I have conducted
<rockosov>
experiments to replicate ATF Amlogic features from binary to ATF source code, and it is an enormous undertaking if you intend to complete it entirely.
camus has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
camus has joined #linux-amlogic
Daanct12 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.8]
<narmstrong>
rockosov: some people (a lot in fact) want to have a fully open sw chain, even if less features are supported, and well amlogic is one of the last platform with no open-source full TF-A support so it's good if something happens if if it will be never production ready
<rockosov>
narmstrong: I understand, thank you for clarifying! Then we will try to help you to moving forward with this activity. However, I must admit that I remain quite skeptical regarding the potential for a fully successful outcome... Amlogic has NUMEROUS custom features, ranging from customized handling of JTAG/efuse to secure videobuf management, which may pose significant challenges to our
<rockosov>
efforts...
<narmstrong>
rockosov: yep I totally understand your needs, but it's a balance between openness and features... other platforms actually provide security features in open-source TF-A so it's more a political issue than a technical issue
<narmstrong>
rockosov: but we won't drop linux & u-boot support for vendor fip, don't worry :-)
<rockosov>
narmstrong: Agree.. At any rate, I see that any contribution towards supporting ATF Amlogic is valuable. This is certainly good news!
<rockosov>
narmstrong: :-)
f_ has joined #linux-amlogic
<f_>
Hi rockosov!
<f_>
You may remember (or not) that Amlogic originally used a libre BL2.
<f_>
What's weird about it is that it fails silently..
<f_>
no warnings, nothing....
JohnnyonFlame has joined #linux-amlogic
<f_>
Will have to go in a bit.
f_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
vagrantc has joined #linux-amlogic
ldevulder has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<minute>
narmstrong: was playing a bit with a311d dsi again, unsuccessfully. i wonder if i have to calculate clk_lp2hs, data_lp2hs and friends correctly?
<minute>
(as these are currently hard-coded)
<narmstrong>
minute: did it change something or it was the same flickering ?
<minute>
narmstrong: the flickering goes away over time, so it's hard to tell
<narmstrong>
minute: the values are specific or vendors and I have no idea how they should be calculated for amlogic
<minute>
hmm, i see. there's no downstream code where this could be gleaned?
<narmstrong>
minute: yes khadas has a tree but it’s hard to figure out any info
<minute>
narmstrong: do you happen to have a link to their code?
<minute>
narmstrong: also, can i just adjust the esc_clk_rate in dw_mipi_dsi_get_esc_clk_rate or do i have to also do that elsewhere?
<minute>
ah sorry, these are used in dphy. alright
<minute>
ah, but for 1920 we should be using those magic numbers for state_change == 1, not 2, right
<minute>
narmstrong: OMG it works
<minute>
narmstrong: the fix is to use these timings for 1920x1080: timing->clk_lp2hs = 23; timing->clk_hs2lp = 38; timing->data_lp2hs = 15; timing->data_hs2lp = 9;