05:29 <sad_plan> prices increased by ~12% right after, and has been continuing increase after that aswell. some products have doubled in price even..

05:30 <sad_plan> sounds like something

16:08 <midfavila> okay on the home stretch for a risc-v kiss

16:09 <midfavila> once i can get a cross-compiled gcc running under kiss on the uconsole and i can compile everything under core i'll release

16:09 <midfavila> working on the native compiler right now

16:31 <sad_plan> awesome midfavila

16:31 <sad_plan> will you be compiling some things nativly on the uconsole? I have a feeling thats going to take foreeveeeeeeeeeer

16:31 <midfavila> yes, i am, and yes, it will

16:32 <midfavila> but i want to be sure that i can recompile the base system on the device before releasing

16:32 <midfavila> if i had my workstation i could run a simulator but

16:32 <midfavila> :\

16:32 <midfavila> still in NB

16:45 <midfavila> fortunately the rockpro64 is still pretty beefy

16:48 <sad_plan> i get that :p

16:49 <midfavila> yeah. i want to get it moved out here but

16:49 <midfavila> something something economy

17:02 <sad_plan> im sure things would settle soon enough, and youd have your desktop

17:03 <midfavila> can always dream

19:15 <midfavila> ngl i might say fuck it to gcc rn and try to cross-compile cproc and qbe

19:15 <midfavila> gcc is giving me a lot of trouble

19:56 <midfavila> if this next attempt fails i'm going to switch to getting qbe+cproc+binutils on the r01 and then go from there

19:56 <midfavila> should be able to build 4.x.x or 6.x.x or w/e gcc cproc can build at this point and then use that to build gcc

20:01 <midfavila> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7644704.html

20:01 <midfavila> seems to be the same issue as these guys

20:01 <midfavila> `ambiguating new declaration of 'char* basename(const char*)' ...`

20:02 <midfavila> of course google is fucking useless :\

20:02 <sad_plan> maybe. cproc builds the 4.x.x version. which is the latest one build in pure C

20:02 <sad_plan> ive been meaning to try to bootstrap that from just cproc tbh, but it requires some patches. I thought it could be a fun thing to do

20:03 <sad_plan> as opposed to using a prebuilt one, to build gcc 14.x.x

20:03 <midfavila> yeah i'm trying that rn

20:03 <midfavila> well

20:03 <sad_plan> instead work my way up from gcc 4.x.x built using cproc

20:03 <midfavila> not from cproc

20:03 <midfavila> using a canadian cross gcc

20:03 <sad_plan> I see

20:03 <midfavila> but i am trying to build 14.2

20:03 <sad_plan> never heard of it

20:03 <sad_plan> I see

20:03 <midfavila> and my god i want to rip my hair out

20:03 <midfavila> oh it's just a way of building cross compilers

20:04 <sad_plan> mcf has some stuff regarding building gcc 4.x.x with cproc anyway. in case youre interested. I think you can find it in cprocs repo. the link that is

20:04 <sad_plan> aah

20:04 <midfavila> target is C, performance machine is B, machine with a compiler is A, use A->A compiler to build an A->B compiler, then use A->B to build B->B, then use B->B to build B->C, and then finish with a C->C if necessary

20:05 <sad_plan> here it is https://github.com/michaelforney/gcc/tree/cproc-fixes

20:05 <midfavila> yeah i might have to. alternatively i might soft-fork kiss-core to get something close to upstream kiss on risc

20:05 <sad_plan> I see

20:05 <midfavila> the increased throughput of cproc would be better on the r01 anyway

20:05 <sad_plan> I suppose

20:06 <midfavila> ionno im dead

20:06 <midfavila> xw

20:06 <midfavila> x

20:06 <midfavila> ive been smashing my head against a wall for ages and i keep running into this problem over and over again

20:07 <midfavila> hrmm

20:07 <midfavila> readme says riscv64-linux-musl is untested...

20:07 <midfavila> we'll see how it goes

20:07 <sad_plan> sounds frustrating. gl

20:08 <midfavila> yes, quite

20:09 <midfavila> and qbe doesn't handle structs with floats on RV64...

20:10 <midfavila> maybe i'll settle for a runtime environment without development tools on the r01 for now.

20:14 <sad_plan> perhaps