03:51 <testuser[m]> Hi

03:52 <testuser[m]> jslick: it needs gnu patch

08:29 <testuser[m]> When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page.

08:41 <testuser[m]> https://drewdevault.com/2022/06/20/Himitsu.html

12:27 <jslick> Was it not feasible to use a patch that is compatible with busybox patch?

12:28 <testuser[m]> U could just re apply the patch and do a git diff

12:29 <testuser[m]> This was probably generated with gnu diff instead of git diff

12:29 <testuser[m]> There's no compatibility tho busybox patch is just dumb

13:52 <omanom> phoebos midfavila-tab https://web.archive.org/web/20100615200822/http://linuxjunkies.org/programming/GUI/xwindow/x11/index.html

13:53 <omanom> is that what you were looking at?

13:57 <cem> I mean it's not a bad idea to update the patch, I personally use patch from busybox, and only use gnu patch with the "g" prefix so to make sure the patches I created apply with the default patch program installed in the system

13:59 <cem> I updated the patch on my repo last time it got broken

15:33 <phoebos> omanom: I don't think I saw that, thanks