RomainManni-Buca has quit [*.net *.split]
JulesIvanicGitte has quit [*.net *.split]
basshelal[m] has quit [*.net *.split]
basshelal[m] has joined #jruby
JulesIvanicGitte has joined #jruby
RomainManni-Buca has joined #jruby
<edipofederle[m]> Morning,
<edipofederle[m]> headius I just see your comment here now. By what I see we still dont have 9.4 branched, right?
<enebo[m]> edipo.federle: it will be on master until it has bee released
<edipofederle[m]> enebo: makes sense, so in order to include it on the docker image ( issue I previous post here) I need to use master as 'target' ?
<enebo[m]> edipo.federle: if you need a branch name yeah
<enebo[m]> At some point it will end up on jruby-9.4 but we generally do not make that until after at least a few point releases
<edipofederle[m]> right,thanks!
<edipofederle[m]> Question this is the behavior on MRI, but since I'm redefining the class, should we continue with only 2 instance variable ?... (full message at
<headius> You don't really redefine classes in Ruby, you just reopen them
<edipofederle[m]> Arg! this is true :)
<headius> So this is still the same Class object and it still has the @y from before
<edipofederle[m]> my bad lol
<edipofederle[m]> yep, for sure.
<edipofederle[m]> btw, I'm taking a look at this, your last comment if from 2017, but still present in current version, is something to be considered relevant yet?
lucerne has quit [Quit: Bye]
greyrat has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
lucerne has joined #jruby
greyrat has joined #jruby