07:20 <fangerer> antocuni: thanks for your review of PR #364. I would also kindly ask to review https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy/pull/339 (trace mode PR). That one should be easy review since it adheres to the design of the debug mode. I still need to implement the Windows support but before I do so, I want to know if you like it.

07:24 <antocuni> fangerer: thanks for pinging me here! I'm reviewing it

07:25 <fangerer> great, thank you

07:26 <fangerer> btw. if you didn't noticed, Petr Viktorin proposed https://peps.python.org/pep-0697 which is similar to what we do in https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy/pull/364. Discussion of the PEP should happen here: https://discuss.python.org/t/19743

07:26 <antocuni> yes, I've seen that but I didn't read it yet

07:27 <fangerer> 👍

07:27 <fangerer> I already commented

07:27 <antocuni> thanks

07:27 <antocuni> I'll try to catch up

11:07 <antocuni> fangerer: review done

11:16 <encukou> I'm Petr, in case you want to talk here :)

11:37 <cfbolz> encukou: 👋

12:42 <fangerer> antocuni: thanks; you are reviewing faster than I can fix the issues 😄 (but that's good)

13:03 <antocuni> should I try to be slower or to find less issues? 😂

18:59 <PurityLake> Hi all, I have returned, I was robert__ the other day. Thought I'd use my github username to make talking about issues easier

19:31 <mattip> hi

20:28 <PurityLake> Curious if anyone else has any opinions on naming for macros in this PR https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy/pull/367

20:29 <PurityLake> The suggested way makes a breaking change but the naming convention I made is just temporary

20:54 <mattip> now is the time for breaking changes, before HPy becomes popular